samba - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
1999-12-13	first pass at updating head branch to be to be the same as the SAMBA_2_0 branch	Andrew Tridgell	1	-54/+77
	(This used to be commit 453a822a76780063dff23526c35408866d0c0154)
1999-10-15	return results on prs_xxxxx() and all xxx_io_xxx() routines.	Luke Leighton	1	-12/+24
	the whole task is not complete, yet. xxx_io_xxx() routines that _call_ xxx_io_xxx() routines not done. prs_xxxx() covered by macros. considering doing xxx_io_xxxx in the same way. (This used to be commit 3b583f7be51434af98bc52b48dfa42c4602a3094)
1998-09-25	added wksinfo command to rpcclient, which don't work too good.	Luke Leighton	1	-0/+13
	(This used to be commit 8d23da91cbd74a45a5b030688fd89d88a25738dc)
1998-09-05	tridge the destroyer returns!	Andrew Tridgell	1	-15/+1
	prompted by the interpret_security() dead code that Jean-Francois pointed out I added a make target "finddead" that finds potentially dead (ie. unused) code. It spat out 304 function names ... I went through these are deleted many of them, making others static (finddead also reports functions that are used only in the local file). in doing this I have almost certainly deleted some useful code. I may have even prevented compilation with some compile options. I apologise. I decided it was better to get rid of this code now and add back the one or two functions that are needed than to keep all this baggage. So, if I have done a bit too much "destroying" then let me know. Keep the swearing to a minimum :) One bit I didn't do is the ubibt code. Chris, can you look at that? Heaps of unused functions there. Can they be made static? (This used to be commit 2204475c87f3024ea8fd1fbd7385b2def617a46f)
1998-03-11	"For I have laboured mightily on Luke's code, and hath broken	Jeremy Allison	1	-0/+146
	all I saw" - the book of Jeremy, chapter 1 :-). So here is the mega-merge of the NTDOM branch server code. It doesn't include the new client side pieces, we'll look at that later. This should give the same functionality, server wise, as the NTDOM branch does, only merged into the main branch. Any fixes to domain controler functionality should be added to the main branch, not the NTDOM branch. This code compiles without warnings on gcc2.8, but will need further testing before we are sure all the working functionality of the NTDOM server branch has been correctly carried over. I hereby declare the server side of the NTDOM branch dead (and all who sail in her :-). Jeremy. (This used to be commit 118ba4d77a33248e762a2cf843fb7cbc906ee6e7)