samba - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2001-09-04	the next stage in the NTSTATUS/WERROR change. smbd and nmbd now compile, but ↵	Andrew Tridgell	1	-1/+1
	the client code still needs some work (This used to be commit dcd6e735f709a9231860ceb9682db40ff26c9a66)
2001-08-27	converted another bunch of stuff to NTSTATUS	Andrew Tridgell	1	-2/+2
	(This used to be commit 1d36250e338ae0ff9fbbf86019809205dd97d05e)
2000-03-22	acconfig.h configure configure.in: Added check for UT_SYSLEN for utmp code.	Jeremy Allison	1	-25/+0
	include/byteorder.h: Added alignment macros. include/nameserv.h: Added defines for msg_type field options - from rfc1002. lib/time.c: Typo fix. lib/util_unistr.c: Updates from UNICODE branch. printing/nt_printing.c: bzero -> memset. smbd/connection.c: Added check for UT_SYSLEN for utmp code. Other fixes : Rollback of unapproved commit from Luke. Please ask next time before doing large changes to HEAD. Jeremy. (This used to be commit f02999dbf7971b4ea05050d7206205d7737a78b2)
2000-03-22	added the following message to all dce/rpc client/server code, except	Luke Leighton	1	-0/+25
	the spoolss code (it's cut from TNG) and the smb-dce/rpc interface code that jeremy has been working up to TNG-functionality. i also want this message to go into SAMBA_2_0 and SAMBA_2_0_RELEASE, because it is intolerable that potentially good modifications be made to code that is going to be thrown away, and people waste their time fixing bugs and adding enhancements that have already been carried out already, up to two years ago in the TNG branch. /* * THIS CODE IS OUT-OF-DATE BY TWO YEARS, IS LEGACY DESIGN AND VERY, VERY, * INCOMPLETE. PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY FURTHER ENHANCEMENTS TO THIS CODE * UNLESS THEY ARE ALSO CARRIED OUT IN THE SAMBA_TNG BRANCH. * * PLEASE DO NOT TREAT THIS CODE AS AUTHORITATIVE IN ANY WAY. * * REPEAT, PLEASE DO NOT MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS TO THIS CODE WITHOUT * FIRST CHECKING THE EQUIVALENT MODULE IN SAMBA_TNG, UPDATING THAT * FIRST, THEN CONSIDER MAKING THE SAME MODIFICATION IN THIS BRANCH * * YOU WILL, ALMOST GUARANTEED, FIND THAT THE BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT THAT * YOU THINK IS NECESSARY, HAS ALREADY BEEN IMPLEMENTED IN SAMBA_TNG. * IF IT HAS NOT, YOUR BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT MUST GO INTO SAMBA_TNG * AS THE SAMBA_TNG CODE WILL REPLACE THIS MODULE WITHOUT REFERENCE TO * ANYTHING IN IT, WITH THE POSSIBLE RISK THAT THE BUG-FIX OR ENHANCEMENT * MAY BE LOST. * * PLEASE OBSERVE AND RESPECT THIS SIMPLE REQUEST. * * THANK YOU. * * lkcl@samba.org */ (This used to be commit cfaea90529be222f8df0e20a7ca1289f99c29e09)
1999-12-13	first pass at updating head branch to be to be the same as the SAMBA_2_0 branch	Andrew Tridgell	1	-54/+77
	(This used to be commit 453a822a76780063dff23526c35408866d0c0154)
1999-10-15	return results on prs_xxxxx() and all xxx_io_xxx() routines.	Luke Leighton	1	-12/+24
	the whole task is not complete, yet. xxx_io_xxx() routines that _call_ xxx_io_xxx() routines not done. prs_xxxx() covered by macros. considering doing xxx_io_xxxx in the same way. (This used to be commit 3b583f7be51434af98bc52b48dfa42c4602a3094)
1998-09-25	added wksinfo command to rpcclient, which don't work too good.	Luke Leighton	1	-0/+13
	(This used to be commit 8d23da91cbd74a45a5b030688fd89d88a25738dc)
1998-09-05	tridge the destroyer returns!	Andrew Tridgell	1	-15/+1
	prompted by the interpret_security() dead code that Jean-Francois pointed out I added a make target "finddead" that finds potentially dead (ie. unused) code. It spat out 304 function names ... I went through these are deleted many of them, making others static (finddead also reports functions that are used only in the local file). in doing this I have almost certainly deleted some useful code. I may have even prevented compilation with some compile options. I apologise. I decided it was better to get rid of this code now and add back the one or two functions that are needed than to keep all this baggage. So, if I have done a bit too much "destroying" then let me know. Keep the swearing to a minimum :) One bit I didn't do is the ubibt code. Chris, can you look at that? Heaps of unused functions there. Can they be made static? (This used to be commit 2204475c87f3024ea8fd1fbd7385b2def617a46f)
1998-03-11	"For I have laboured mightily on Luke's code, and hath broken	Jeremy Allison	1	-0/+146
	all I saw" - the book of Jeremy, chapter 1 :-). So here is the mega-merge of the NTDOM branch server code. It doesn't include the new client side pieces, we'll look at that later. This should give the same functionality, server wise, as the NTDOM branch does, only merged into the main branch. Any fixes to domain controler functionality should be added to the main branch, not the NTDOM branch. This code compiles without warnings on gcc2.8, but will need further testing before we are sure all the working functionality of the NTDOM server branch has been correctly carried over. I hereby declare the server side of the NTDOM branch dead (and all who sail in her :-). Jeremy. (This used to be commit 118ba4d77a33248e762a2cf843fb7cbc906ee6e7)