Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Autobuild-User: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Feb 18 06:22:40 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
metze
Autobuild-User: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Mon Dec 12 16:08:59 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
metze
|
|
#8473)
We should enforce the negotiated max sizes instead of the
lp_smb2_max_*() sizes.
metze
|
|
metze
|
|
Guenther
Autobuild-User: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Apr 29 14:00:30 CEST 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Guenther
|
|
|
|
|
|
64-bit Vista client
It turns out that the persistent handles are used by the Microsoft
redirector to index files on oplock break requests. So even if we
don't do durable handles (yet) we must set the persistent handle
on create. For now just use the same handle value as we use for
volatile.
Jeremy.
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
immediate event).
Jeremy.
|
|
Don't free the cancelled SMB2 req early, let the cancelation
function take care of it. Return a NT_STATUS_CANCELLED when
we find and cancel a request. Fix our SMB2 error returns to
correctly set the structuresize to 9, and add the expected
zero byte (see section 2.2.2 in the SMB2 spec.).
This causes Samba to pass the test program in this bug report
that W2K8R2 fails (heh heh :-). This is because we always cause
compound requests to get to a cancelation point before dealing
with a cancel request.
Jeremy.
|
|
right.
Gets us handling SMB2 compound async requests similar to W2K8R2
(and triggers the same client bug in the Win7 redirector). Great
thanks to Ira Cooper <samba@ira.wakeful.net> for helping with
this and to Metze for the wonderful async framework. The one
thing I need to fix to make us identical to W2K8R2 is that
when a compound request goes async at the end W2K8R2 splits
the replies up into a compound non-async reply followed by
a separate async reply. Currently we're doing the whole thing
in a compound reply.
Jeremy.
|
|
Set to 64k by default.
Jeremy.
|
|
metze
|
|
metze
|
|
This will hold code that's shared between source3 and source4.
metze
|
|
This should avoid confusion between smbd_server_connection
and connection_struct variables.
metze
|
|
I know those warnings are bogus, but both Coverity and gcc don't get it.
|
|
|
|
metze
|