Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
share_mode_data.num_share_modes is a uint32.
48 bytes less in .o text size for -O3 :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This is the same code in both routines
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Define a variable to dereference lck->data just once. Believe it or not,
this saves a few bytes .o with -O3 :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10208
Authentication error in smb2 session reauth invalidates
the session. In this case the session must in contrast
to successful session setup requests be torn down and live
no longer than the request.
The talloc move of the session from the global session
table to the request ensures that the session setup
reply can still be correctly signed, but subsequent
requests on the connection don't find a session any more.
Pair-Programmed-With: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
With the special case for bug 5980 in do_break_to_none we only have
one caller: process_oplock_async_level2_break_message. The further
goal is to merge process_oplock_async_level2_break_message with
process_oplock_break_message.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Oct 15 03:42:53 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
With the level2 indicator in brlock.tdb this race condition does not
exist anymore
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK was an indicator to break level2 oplock holders
on write. This information is now being held in brlock.tdb, which makes
the FAKE_LEVEL_II_OPLOCK type unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sun Oct 13 14:35:26 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This came from delete_on_close handling which was factored out.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
We need to check for DELETE_PENDING before the first oplock break
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Oct 12 01:56:18 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
In open_file_ntcreate we do the del_share_mode on error. We should do
it here as well.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 9 01:58:55 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This has been converted from a timed event to an immediate one in
e7dab403c0ca6f6
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
The brlock-check is done in grant_fsp_oplock_type
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This makes the code that checks for extra create blobs in the
case of the dh2c blob look very similar to the corresponding
(slightly mode complex) code for the dhnc blob.
With this preparation it will be easier and more obvious how
to add proper treatment of the lease request blobs when leases
get implemented.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Oct 5 15:56:11 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This is according to MS-SMB2, 3.3.5.9.7
"Handling the SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_RECONNECT Create Context"
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
According to MS-SMB2:
3.3.5.9.7 Handling the SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_RECONNECT Create Context
3.3.5.9.12 Handling the SMB2_CREATE_DURABLE_HANDLE_RECONNECT_V2 Create Context
and verified by test results.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
I.e. the durable reconnect attempt is v1 while the original create was durable
v2 including the create guid.
Implement this by skipping the create_guid verification when
the reconnect request is v1.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
only one
With leases this will not be true any more.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
don't have a sesseion
I.e. when the request is a session setup.
We replied with ACCESS_DENIED, but windows expects USER_SESSION_DELETED
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Oct 2 22:07:44 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Windows (at least the test suites) may skip the SMB2_HDR_FLAG_SIGNED
in a reauth session setup, but still provide a valid signature.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Fix for ACL problem - not accepting DENY. Code was checking for pointer and not for content.
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Sep 21 05:24:07 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Using next_codepoint() does the same check, but without the conversion
message.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
|
|
execute aways"
3.6 and earlier allowed open for execution when execute permissions are
not present on a file. This has been fixed in Samba 4.0.
This patch changes smbd to skip the execute bit from the ACL check
in the open code if "acl allow execute always = yes", hence
re-establishing the old behaviour in this case.
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: David Disseldorp <ddiss@samba.org>
|
|
When a Windows client receives a large directory listing while
querying snapshots, it sends a find request asking for the
timestamp as a directory. A Windows server returns NO_SUCH_FILE,
so make sure Samba returns the same. Otherwise the client will
get confused and display timestamps in the 'previous versions' dialog.
Signed-off-by: Christof Schmitt <christof.schmitt@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 10 22:38:51 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
this routine builds a list of sessions from a
particular remote machine or user.
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
added capability to filter sessions based on remote
machine name and user name.
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
We don't have lck allocated yet at these points. Remove the TALLOC_FREE
calls that triggered me looking for the get_share_mode_lock calls.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This flag existed to break an exclusive or batch oplock in just one
instead of two steps down to "no oplock" when we did an allocation or file
size change. Running raw.oplock against W2k12 differs in this respect
from W2k3: W2k12 takes two steps (via level2) to break to none. This
removes the special flag that we only had for compatibility with systems
older than W2k12...
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 00:47:07 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This needs doing even if we don't have strct allocate set. The client
should not know that we lied. Fixes smb2.oplock.batch12.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 4 22:36:24 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
If we get an oplock break response, we forgot to remove the oplock break
timeout.
Found by stopping raw.oplock.exclusive5 after the 2nd open and watching a debug
level 10 log. This amends 08a9de89 from 2007.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This is required if the client offered less buffer than the fixed portion
of the info level data requires
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
The stream_info marshalling follows its own rules. This needs unifying
eventually...
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This was too broad and has been replaced by finer-grained error checks
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Also, don't overflow the client buffer
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
We have to return this error if the client offered less than the fixed
portion of the infolevel data requires
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
The error message will have to change depending whether the buffer is
too small for the fixed or variable buffers
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|