| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
samba-technical@samba.org. If
you do a tdb_set_max_dead(tdb, n), then for this tdb a delete operation will
only mark a record as dead and re-use it if a new record is created. The
parameter n allows for at most n dead records per hash chain. If this number
is exceeded, all dead records are put on the central freelist.
Volker
(This used to be commit 97af3a019b196d530a50ffc05c57568e2dbda4bb)
|
|
need to
agree on the behaviour of non-existing records.
Tridge, can you comment? Should we change tdb_fetch, or should we have
different concepts in tdb_fetch() and tdb_parse_record() ?
Volker
(This used to be commit fba79e75c0138c3ae4e73014a1d1a2c2045c35bb)
|
|
in-memory
mirrors of the hash chain locks to a dynamically allocated one.
Jeremy, I count on you to revert it if the build farm freaks out, it's after
midnight here :-)
Volker
(This used to be commit c50f099be1fcae2d533e1c3816cb25c315ba167a)
|
|
(This used to be commit 2fdfc54e7eebc68c81ad5f3fa8d0607bd3b579c5)
|
|
tdb. This includes:
- the new tdb_lockall and tdb_lockall_read code, which will be needed
for the ldb speedups
- the tdb logging changes. This is an intermediate step to keep the
differences between the two branches small. The plan is still to
move to a tdb_init()/tdb_set_logging_function()/tdb_attach() style
of open which will make things much cleaner.
- the updated test suites and standalone tdb build code
- use libreplace headers
There are still some small differences I haven't merged. I'll discuss
those on the list.
(This used to be commit 48903c75edfaf75dbd3e9d052e615552cdff39b4)
|
|
Let's see what it breaks. For me it works :-)
Volker
(This used to be commit 337be14b432e5dfd80c7418b2db4fe0087259b77)
|
