Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
This started per https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8872#c4
and avoids any possible collision with a different process.
We also need to ensure that across a Samba installation on a single
node that id.vnn is the same. Samba4 previously used 0, while Samba3
used NONCLUSTER_VNN. When a message is sent between these 'different'
nodes, the error NT_STATUS_INVALID_DEVICE_REQUEST is raised.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
Autobuild-User: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Apr 28 23:38:45 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Much of the code further down and up the call chain expects the
structures wb_lookupsids returns to be allocated. Do that despite
we have nothing to look up.
|
|
Autobuild-User: Richard Sharpe <sharpe@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Apr 28 08:05:00 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
The raw.composite test checks that we handle mutliple concurrent connections.
Andrew Bartlett
Autobuild-User: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Apr 27 16:25:37 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
When we have no description, there is no need for a leading space here
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
metze
Autobuild-User: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Apr 27 13:10:15 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
metze
|
|
metze
|
|
metze
|
|
Jeremy, I know you like it explicit, but I stumbled across this
explicit TALLOC_FREE and asked myself about a potentially wrong
talloc hierarchy.
Autobuild-User: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Thu Apr 26 23:00:03 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
Autobuild-User: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Thu Apr 26 12:17:14 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Pair-Programmed-With: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
regkey_open_onelevel().
Pair-Programmed-With: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
could not be loaded
WERR_NO_MORE_ITEMS seems inappropriate.
Pair-Programmed-With: Gregor Beck <gbeck@sernet.de>
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
This prevents race between fetching seqnum and key content.
Because there is currently no way to atomically fetch the
record along with the seqnum, I use a loop.
This is far from optimal and should should ideally be done
differently. But for now it fixes the race.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
This prevents race between fetching seqnum and key content.
Because there is currently no way to atomically fetch the
record along with the seqnum, I use a loop.
This is far from optimal and should should ideally be done
differently. But for now it fixes the race.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
regval_store_keys
The purpose is to prevent next reads from going to disk.
Note that this will currently only be effective with local tdbs, not
with ctdb: For tdb, store and delete bump the seqnum while transaction
commit does not. For ctdb, transaction commit bumps the seqnum, while
store and delete don't... This needs fixing (in ctdb).
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
prevent next read from going to disk if possible
Note that this will currently only be effective in the local TDB implementation.
For CTDB, this wont work since seqnum currently works differently there (needs
fixing): For tdb, store and delete operations bump the db seqnum, while
transaction commits don't. For ctdb, the seqnum is bumped by the transaction
commit but not by store and delete operations.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
This is wrong layering but fixes a race condition.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
This is wrong layering (calling into regdb_transaction* in the reg_api code)
but fixes a potential race. It makes the multi-step create procedure atomic.
This should completely be done in the backend.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
This is at the wrong layer, but if fixes a race potentially causing
data corruption by concurrent access.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
(there was no lock around fetching the values and storing them)
The layering is wrong in that it uses regdb transactions in reg_api
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
reg_setvalue()
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
This is like regval_ctr_key_exists() but does not return bool,
but the regval_blob instead, if found, and NULL if not found.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
while it runs
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
just like the other backends.
This is in preparation of making the backend functions private
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
|