Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Requires new talloc
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
changing smb server version from 4.9 to 6.1 to
mimic win2k8r2.
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 19:41:51 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 15:29:55 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
We don't have lck allocated yet at these points. Remove the TALLOC_FREE
calls that triggered me looking for the get_share_mode_lock calls.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
There's no point checking the validity of the "entry" argument more
than once
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This flag existed to break an exclusive or batch oplock in just one
instead of two steps down to "no oplock" when we did an allocation or file
size change. Running raw.oplock against W2k12 differs in this respect
from W2k3: W2k12 takes two steps (via level2) to break to none. This
removes the special flag that we only had for compatibility with systems
older than W2k12...
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Sep 6 00:47:07 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This needs doing even if we don't have strct allocate set. The client
should not know that we lied. Fixes smb2.oplock.batch12.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Sep 5 20:09:21 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 4 22:36:24 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
If we get an oplock break response, we forgot to remove the oplock break
timeout.
Found by stopping raw.oplock.exclusive5 after the 2nd open and watching a debug
level 10 log. This amends 08a9de89 from 2007.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
already did a NULL query.
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Wed Sep 4 01:19:05 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
function.
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
|
|
Leave dsgetdcname_internal() only using const char *site_name.
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
|
|
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
|
|
Bug 5917 - Samba does not work on site with Read Only Domain Controller
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Richard Sharpe <rsharpe@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Sep 3 19:13:14 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
The comment for this routine said:
> Modifies d->num_share_modes, watch out in routines iterating over
> that array.
Well, it turns out that *every* caller of this API got it wrong. So I
think it's better to change the routine.
This leaves the array untouched while iterating but filters out the
deleted ones while saving them back to disk.
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
We'll need "i" in a later checkin ... :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Hey, pidl knows the [skip] attribute ... :-)
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
The vfs_gluster_open() function generates a debug message (at level 0)
for every failed attempt to open a pathname. This includes cases in
which attempts are made to open a directory as a file (those attempts
are retried calling vfs_gluster_opendir()). The result is that the log
file fills with messages about failed attempts to open directories, just
because they are directories.
This latest version, of the patch completely removes logging from the
vfs_gluster_open() function. The error code returned is handled in
upper layers, and the open function in the default VFS module does not
log any errors.
Signed-off-by: Christopher R. Hertel <crh@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: susant palai <spalai@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: raghavendra talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jose A. Rivera <jarrpa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Aug 30 02:43:48 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This prevents segfaults when e.g. a previous SMB_STRDUP failed..
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Aug 29 18:54:28 CEST 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This avoids calling secrets functions directly.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
find_domain_from_name_no_init().
Otherwise there is a good chance the domain has not been connected and we don't
know the realm name yet.
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Guenther
Signed-off-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This is required if the client offered less buffer than the fixed portion
of the info level data requires
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
The stream_info marshalling follows its own rules. This needs unifying
eventually...
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
This was too broad and has been replaced by finer-grained error checks
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
Also, don't overflow the client buffer
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|
|
We have to return this error if the client offered less than the fixed
portion of the infolevel data requires
Bug: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10106
Signed-off-by: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org>
|