samba - Unnamed repository; edit this file 'description' to name the repository.

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author	Files	Lines
2007-10-10	r22421: merged in latest ctdb changes from bzr	Andrew Tridgell	1	-43/+104
	(This used to be commit 3633f862b966866819c9a0a6ad0238a858e15e62)
2007-10-10	r22231: merge from bzr ctdb tree	Andrew Tridgell	1	-11/+213
	(This used to be commit 807b959082d3b9a929c9f6597714e636638a940e)
2007-10-10	r22117: merged from bzr	Andrew Tridgell	1	-1/+2
	(This used to be commit d7f122df1dba30e46e84e294cccecb2e4ef82072)
2007-10-10	r22098: merged from bzr tree	Andrew Tridgell	1	-0/+5
	(This used to be commit a57af1ff8234ab590ebf28b3316953bec880005c)
2007-10-10	r22082: merged the ctdb changes from bzr	Andrew Tridgell	1	-0/+3
	added opendb ctdb backend from ronnie (This used to be commit b0da25cb79f860bfa14ba7a8419c7996d936292b)
2007-10-10	r22070: merge in the changes from the bzr ctdb tree, and convert the brlock	Andrew Tridgell	1	-4/+15
	ctdb backend to use the updated multi-database API (This used to be commit 44dcac9e4d81bfc078512248967b6240db9d1bd8)
2007-10-10	r21232: added a raw ctdb messaging api - allowing ctdb applications to take	Andrew Tridgell	1	-1/+13
	advantage of the ctdb messaging layer for their own data (This used to be commit b288ba05e5dc2aa5c8cd26eaee1c41b12e4996da)
2007-10-10	r21045: every call in brlock_ctdb ended up neededing a 32 bit status code, so	Andrew Tridgell	1	-0/+1
	rather than allocating a reply_data field each time, I have changed the ctdb_call API to include a status code. That greatly simplifies use of the API. (This used to be commit 70c3acaf8876fa5712e2135df234fe3bc1e32e77)
2007-10-10	r20945: fixed the bug causing locktest to fail with the ctdb backend after a	Andrew Tridgell	1	-1/+1
	couple of hundred opertations. Also removed a lot of the debug code I was using to track this down. (This used to be commit 7622e7b4b2694ec14062d0f6de035b946106a6aa)
2007-10-10	r20901: - not all compiler like uint8_t data[0] elements!	Stefan Metzmacher	1	-5/+5
	- this fix looks really ugly but I don't know a better solution... if we would use uint8_t data; then we would send the pointer value also in the network packet and we would need to initialize s->data = ((void )(&s->data) + 1; to make the memcpy statements work as they're currently, so we use uint8_t data[1] in the struct definition ... tridge: please review careful! hopefully fix the build on solaris and HPUX metze (This used to be commit 015097677c8a65e9f5a4367f4f89193a4b2de76b)
2007-10-10	r20900: fix compiler warnings	Stefan Metzmacher	1	-1/+1
	metze (This used to be commit cb59eae91966e3e493c3c992d2b96965d17dac17)
2007-10-10	r20896: make the maximum lacount configurable in smb.conf	Andrew Tridgell	1	-1/+2
	at the moment the brlock_ctdb backend will sometimes fail after dmaster migrations. So to pass tests this needs to be set high. Thats a priority to fix. (This used to be commit 45f5c272f366f6a793941d97c9522c5b2b0cb639)
2007-10-10	r20889: import ctdb cluster backend from bzr	Andrew Tridgell	1	-0/+216
	it will be interesting to see how the build farm handles this (This used to be commit 53be449630bd67d649a9e70cc7e25a9799c0616b)