Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
If we immediately afterwards perform an LDB base operation then we don't
need an explicit "ldb_dn_validate" check anymore (only OOM makes sense).
Reviewed by: Tridge
|
|
It is defined as LDAP syntax 2.5.5.9 so no need at all to treat it as
64-bit integer.
Reviewed by: Kamenim and Metze
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Mar 1 12:46:15 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This isn't used anymore.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This isn't needed anymore and will be substituted by
"ldb_msg_add_string".
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This call can be substituted by "ldb_msg_add_string". We only need to be
careful on local objects or talloc'ed ones which live shorter than the message.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Autobuild-User: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Mon Feb 28 23:30:06 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Autobuild-User: Kamen Mazdrashki <kamenim@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sun Feb 27 00:10:45 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
thi ensures we are using the header corresponding to the version of
ldb we're linking against. Otherwise we could use the system ldb for
link and the in-tree one for include
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This makes everything reference a server_info->sids list, which is now
a struct dom_sid *, not a struct dom_sid **. This is in keeping with
the other sid lists in the security_token etc.
In the process, I also tidy up the talloc tree (move more structures
under their logical parents) and check for some possible overflows in
situations with a pathological number of sids.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
Use the temporary list unless we have at least the three main
"namingContexts" from the rootDSE available (Default, Configuration, Schema -
these are mandatory on all AD deployments!).
This bug has been discovered by Nadya in relation with her SD work.
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Jan 15 19:01:11 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
|
|
this DN we have came from an extended DN search, which means it may
have multiple extended components. We need to minimise the DN before
AD will accept it
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This removes a silly cross-dependency between the ldb moudle stack and auth/
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is consistent with the test names used by selftest, should
make the names less confusing and easier to integrate with other tools.
Autobuild-User: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Dec 11 04:16:13 CET 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAM members
For example contacts.
|
|
better memory context
"msg->elements" fits better than "msg".
|
|
attribute isn't available yet
This is needed on provisioning when the modules aren't set up yet.
|
|
This should prevent crashes as pointed out on the mailing list.
|
|
the password_hash LDB module
It's only used there and so I think it doesn't really belong in
"dsdb/common/util.c" (I first thought that it could be useful for ACL checking
but obviously it wasn't).
|
|
metze
|
|
attributes
We should have them just in one place, so that we don't forget some of them.
metze
|
|
- don't crash when no values where specified
- return ERR_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATION on malformed messages
- only check for flags when we are involved in a LDB modify operation
|
|
fetch and set should use the same name!
metze
|
|
This should represent a replication partner - never the DC iself
|
|
All other "samdb_search_*" calls do have one - why "samdb_search_count" doesn't?
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Mon Oct 25 17:42:33 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This is useful for "samdb_search_count" where only the amount of entries
matters.
|
|
This control is exactly thought for the actions which previously were performed
using the RELAX one.
We agreed that the RELAX control will only remain for interactions with OpenLDAP.
|
|
This will happen on an OpenLDAP backend, because @ records are invalid in LDAP.
We don't have these sequence numbers in this case.
Andrew Bartlett
|
|
in "dsdb/common/util.c""
This reverts commit 8a2ce5c47cee499f90b125ebde83de5f9f1a9aa0.
Jelmer pointed out that these are also in use by other LDB databases - not only
SAMDB ones.
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sun Oct 17 13:37:16 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
"dsdb/common/util.c"
They're only in use by SAMDB code.
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sun Oct 17 09:40:13 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
"samdb_msg_add_uint", "samdb_msg_add_uint64" and "samdb_msg_set_uint" a bit more
Unsigned int data in AD is a bit problematic to handle. Problem described by
abartlet.
|
|
"samdb_msg_add_string"
"ldb_msg_add_string" is safe here since the integer has already been converted
to a string which is "talloc"ed on "mem_ctx".
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Oct 15 09:11:49 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
"samdb_msg_add_string"
|
|
|
|
need to be duplicated
This is done internally by the LDB library - look at "ldb_msg_add_empty".
|
|
This can be substituted by "ldb_msg_add_value".
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Fri Oct 15 00:21:53 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
"samdb_result_uint64" and "samdb_result_string"
We have ldb_msg_find_attr_as_* calls which do exactly the same. Therefore this
reduces only code redundancies.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This includes dom_sid.h and security_token.h and will be moved
to the top level shortly.
Andrew Bartlett
Autobuild-User: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Tue Oct 12 03:35:36 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
|
|
SAMDB_COMMON and DSDB_MODULE_HELPERS.
|
|
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Thu Oct 7 07:40:31 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
They will be used by the samldb LDB module
|
|
Use it only in conjunction with the DELETE one to allow the functions to work
also against Windows < 2008R2. This is really important for the vampire
operation.
Also mark the RECYCLED control as non-critical (so that it's simply ignored by
older Windows'es).
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Mon Oct 4 16:10:11 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
We intend to see always all objects with the "show_deleted" control specified.
To see also recycled objects (beginning with 2008_R2 function level) we need to
use the new "show_recycled" control.
As far as I see this is only internal code and therefore we don't run into
problems if we do substitute it.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This is needed since starting with 2008_R2 function level we get another type
of hidden objects which aren't seen by the "show_deleted" control: recycled
objects.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|