Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009-12-16 | s4-dsdb: it is a better pattern to mark a control as done than remove it | Andrew Tridgell | 1 | -2/+1 | |
removing a control means it can't be seen by any other modules, which is usually not what is wanted. Better to just mark it non-critical, which means anyone else who wants to look at it can, but if nobody does its not an error. | |||||
2009-10-02 | s4:dsdb Add 'lazy_commit' module to swallow the 'lazy commit' OID | Andrew Bartlett | 1 | -0/+132 | |
This allows this control to be specified as critical. We support the control because we choose to always be durable in our transactions. We really, really need a 'duplicate request' API, as at the moment we can't do this without a large, error-prone set of code that cannot cope with new request fields or types. Andrew Bartlett |