Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb:ridalloc: use ridalloc_ridset_values infrastructure in ↵ | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -74/+56 | |
ridalloc_allocate_rid_pool_fsmo() metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb:ridalloc: use ridalloc_ridset_values infrastructure in ↵ | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -80/+102 | |
ridalloc_allocate_rid() metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb:ridalloc: use ridalloc_ridset_values infrastructure in ↵ | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -19/+14 | |
ridalloc_create_rid_set_ntds() metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb:ridalloc: add ridalloc_ridset_values infrastructure | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+83 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb:ridalloc: use dsdb_module_constrainted_update_uint64() to update ↵ | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -2/+2 | |
rIDAvailablePool metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb:ridalloc.c: fix C++ warning | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -1/+2 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb: add dsdb_module_constrainted_update_uint32/64() wrapper functions | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+22 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb: add dsdb_msg_constrainted_update_uint32/64() wrapper functions | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+22 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb: add dsdb_module_constrainted_update_int32/64() functions | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+58 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb: add dsdb_msg_constrainted_update_int32/64() functions | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+96 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4:acl LDB module - password attributes - check also the "dBCSPwd" attribute | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+2 | |
It's also a possible password change/set attribute candidate. | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4:acl LDB module - move a "mem_ctx" creation to the place where it is ↵ | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -1/+2 | |
actually checked Memory allocations and their result checks should be as tight as possible. | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-dsdb/util: Reorder DSDB_FLAG_* checks | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -30/+30 | |
On good thing about having more clear function interfaces (and forcing callers to specify clearly what they want) is that now I can execute following search: git grep DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE | wc -l This showed that DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag is about 6 times more frequently used than DSDB_FLAG_OWN_MODULE. So this should reduce branch prediction by six times in this part of the code, right :) | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-dsdb: Implement module switching in dsdb_module_search_dn() | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+10 | |
This allows caller to choose from where to start DN search | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -5/+12 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c Use ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+4 | |
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/naming_fsmo.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+2 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/operational.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -3/+7 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition_init.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -3/+6 | |
flag | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/pdc_fsmo.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+2 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -3/+7 | |
flag | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/ridalloc.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -3/+6 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba_dsdb.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -2/+4 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/schema_load.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+2 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/util.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -2/+4 | |
2010-07-07 | s4-dsdb: use ldb_operr() in the dsdb code | Andrew Tridgell | 38 | -565/+391 | |
this replaces "return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR" with "return ldb_operr(ldb)" in places in the dsdb code where we don't already explicitly set an error string. This should make is much easier to track down dsdb module bugs that result in an operations error. | |||||
2010-07-06 | s4:new_partition LDB module - fix an uninitalised variable warning | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+1 | |
> [ 651/1946] Compiling dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c > ../dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c: In function 'new_partition_add': > ../dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c:195: warning: 'down_req' may be used uninitialized in this function The "down_req" variable isn't used anymore. | |||||
2010-07-05 | s4:dsdb/password_hash: implement DSDB_CONTROL_BYPASS_PASSWORD_HASH_OID | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+20 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-05 | s4:dsdb: allocate DSDB_CONTROL_BYPASS_PASSWORD_HASH_OID | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+5 | |
When importing users from Samba3 we need to control all values. metze | |||||
2010-07-05 | s4:dsdb/password_hash: fix some c++ compiler warnings | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -9/+12 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-05 | s4-dsdb: Implementation of User-Change-Password and User-Force-Password-Change | Nadezhda Ivanova | 1 | -79/+162 | |
These CARs need to be checked on password change and password reset operations. Apparently the password attributes are not influenced by Write Property. Single detele operations and modifications of dBCSPwd are let through to the password_hash module. This is determined experimentally. | |||||
2010-07-04 | s4:subtree_rename LDB module - Cosmetic fixes | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -3/+4 | |
2010-07-04 | s4:subtree_delete LDB module - fix comments and add my copyright | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+3 | |
(I've introduced the subtree delete mechanism) | |||||
2010-07-03 | s4:schema_load LDB module - fix a segfault condition on schema refresh | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -0/+5 | |
The schema refresh operation itself starts requests from the top of the LDB modules stack (see call "dsdb_schema_set_attributes" - search operations). This doesn't work well when these do perform "dsdb_get_schema" calls. Since the new schema isn't marked as "refreshed" atm (but in fact it still is - we didn't terminate the reload/refresh yet) we could perform other calls to "dsdb_schema_refresh" and run into serious trouble (segfault). | |||||
2010-07-03 | s4:dsdb_module_load_partition_usn - check for "res->count" equal/unequal to 1 | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -1/+1 | |
2010-07-03 | s4:schema_load.c - jump to "failed" on an error condition | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -3/+2 | |
2010-07-02 | s4-dsdb: fixed spelling of supportedSASLMechanisms | Andrew Tridgell | 1 | -1/+1 | |
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4/dsdb: Assert DSDB_FLAG_*_MODULE is always passed in function call | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -0/+5 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/util.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -2/+3 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_delete.c: Use ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+3 | |
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/schema_load.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+2 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -4/+5 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba3sid.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+3 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/rootdse.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -2/+3 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/ridalloc.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+1 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c: Use ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -4/+5 | |
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c: make use of ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -2/+2 | |
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4/dsdb: Add DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -0/+1 | |
Although it is not currently used in implementation, my intention is for callers to clearly state what action they want to execute. Currently when a caller wants to pass the call to the next module in the chain, this flag is either omitted or 0 is used (which is somewhat hacky, isn't it) Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-06-29 | s4:dsdb/new_partition.c - remove the "ldb_next_request" call which we find ↵ | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -3/+1 | |
also below the "if" block | |||||
2010-06-29 | Revert "s4/dsdb: Fixed partition_search() not to pass special DN's to LDAP ↵ | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -8/+6 | |
backend." This reverts commit ed4c107bc1eac8531fdd8d09f7698efcbc7ecb14. See post "Endi's Bug 7530 patches (LDAP backend)" on samba-technical. |