summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/dsdb/schema/schema_syntax.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-06-22s4-schema: generalized time use its own syntax nowMatthieu Patou1-1/+0
2012-04-29Add some debug for FOOBAR return case as they are hard to diagnoseMatthieu Patou1-0/+3
Autobuild-User: Matthieu Patou <mat@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Sun Apr 29 09:08:15 CEST 2012 on sn-devel-104
2011-10-12s3:utils change data_blob_dup_talloc() to take a DATA_BLOB by valueGregor Beck1-2/+2
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
2011-08-25s4-dsdb: fixed calls to ldb_val_string_cmp()Andrew Tridgell1-2/+2
wrong order of arguments
2011-08-09s4-dsdb: fixed booling conversion to check value lengthAndrew Tridgell1-11/+14
this ensures we don't look past the end of the data Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2011-08-09s4-dsdb: add auto-normalisation of attributesAndrew Tridgell1-3/+9
this auto-normalises some attributes when they are added/modified. The list that we auto-normalise is currently: Boolean INT32 INTEGER UTC_TIME This fixes a problem with groupType being stored in an unnormalised form Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2011-07-13dsdb: fixed special case of zero NTTIMEAndrew Tridgell1-0/+20
we can't convert 0 NTTIME via a unix time_t Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2011-06-22s4-schema: avoid segfaulting if id3.guid is NULLMatthieu Patou1-2/+1
2011-06-22s4-dsdb: don't add zero GUID to BINARY_DNAndrew Tridgell1-9/+11
When converting from DRS to ldb format for a BINARY_DN, don't add the GUID extended DN element if the GUID is all zeros. Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2011-06-17s4-dsdb: if we don't have a remote schema, then use the local oneAndrew Tridgell1-2/+8
this allows the use of drsuapi_to_ldb() on all attributes for the local database
2011-04-07dsdb:schema/schema_syntax.c - correctly check error code of ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-2/+1
"ldb_string_utc_to_time" This one doesn't set ERRNO. An error happens if the result is "0". Reviewed-by: abartlet
2011-04-07dsdb:schema/schema_syntax.c - add some empty value checks on validate functionsMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-0/+9
They are needed since the check in "ldb_msg_sanity_check" will be removed. Reviewed-by: abartlet
2011-03-29Ensure convert_string_XXX is always called with a valid converted_size pointer.Jeremy Allison1-2/+4
Preparation for cleaning up this API. Autobuild-User: Jeremy Allison <jra@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Tue Mar 29 21:01:49 CEST 2011 on sn-devel-104
2011-03-24charcnv: removed the allow_badcharcnv and allow_bad_conv options to ↵Andrew Tridgell1-5/+5
convert_string*() we shouldn't accept bad multi-byte strings, it just hides problems Autobuild-User: Andrew Tridgell <tridge@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Thu Mar 24 01:47:26 CET 2011 on sn-devel-104
2011-02-10ldb: use #include <ldb.h> for ldbAndrew Tridgell1-2/+2
thi ensures we are using the header corresponding to the version of ldb we're linking against. Otherwise we could use the system ldb for link and the in-tree one for include Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-12-21s4:dsdb/schema/schema_* - adaptions needed for removed "const" on OIDsMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+1
2010-12-15s4-dsdb_schema: Handle remote ATTIDs based on msDs-IntId valueKamen Mazdrashki1-4/+17
If we get such an msDs-IntId value, then we should just use it, there is no mapping available for such values
2010-12-15s4-schema_syntax: Log error message when ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-1/+5
_dsdb_syntax_OID_oid_drsuapi_to_ldb() fails I haven't found a way to test this function during replication so far, but when I do, it will be useful to notice this error in the log file
2010-12-15s4-schema_syntax: We should use make_ATTID function when converting ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-1/+1
remote-ATTID to local one We may have no prefix for the remote ATTID (remote OID strictly speaking) So this is the place for us to update our local prefixMap adding a prefix for the numeric OID we've recived
2010-12-15s4-schema_syntax: Use remote prefixMap to map remote ATTID to local oneKamen Mazdrashki1-5/+13
in dsdb_attribute_drsuapi_to_ldb() function. drsuapi_DsReplicaAttribute *in parameter come from remote DC so we can't rely on in->attid to map it directly to an dsdb_attribute in our local schema cache
2010-12-02s4-dsdb/syntax: Map remote ATTIDs for Class OID syntaxKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+6
Autobuild-User: Kamen Mazdrashki <kamenim@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Thu Dec 2 18:47:59 CET 2010 on sn-devel-104
2010-12-02s4-dsdb_syntax: Be a little bit more chatty when we can't an ATTID in our cacheKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+3
2010-12-01s4-dsdb/syntax: Map remote ATTIDs for Attribute OID syntaxKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+6
2010-12-01s4-dsdb/syntax: Implement Remote-ATTID to Local-ATTID mapping functionKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+35
2010-11-11s4-repl: Propagate remote prefixMap in DRSUAPI data conversion functionsKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+2
2010-11-11s4-dsdb_syntax: Warning message that we can't find requested ATTID in Schema ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-0/+1
Cache
2010-11-11s4-dsdb_syntax: Use remote prefixMap to handle generic cases in ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-2/+7
drsuapi_to_ldb conversions
2010-11-11s4-dsdb_syntax: Add remote prefixMap member for dsdb_syntax conversionsKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+2
2010-11-01s4-dsdb_schema: Use DRSUAPI_ATTID_INVALID instead of 0xFFFFFFFF magic valueKamen Mazdrashki1-25/+25
Autobuild-User: Kamen Mazdrashki <kamenim@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Mon Nov 1 00:36:20 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
2010-10-31idl: Use DRSUAPI_ATTID_ prefix instead of DRSUAPI_ATTRIBUTE_ for ATTID valuesKamen Mazdrashki1-33/+33
Those values are actually ATTID values and such, they are used for ATTIDs for Attributes, Classes and Syntaxes.
2010-10-26s4-dsdb_syntax: *_OID_oid_ldb_to_drsuapi() functions should useKamen Mazdrashki1-6/+6
dsdb_schema_pfm_attid_from_oid() instead of dsdb_schema_pfm_make_attid() as those functions are supposed to return ATTIDs only for OIDs we already know about (i.e. are in prefixMap) Autobuild-User: Kamen Mazdrashki <kamenim@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Tue Oct 26 22:44:36 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
2010-10-22s4-dsdb_syntax: Setup "String(Case Sensitive)" syntaxKamen Mazdrashki1-3/+10
Currently it is mapped to Octet String LDAP syntax for comparison purposes. According to LDAP rfc we should be using same comparison as Directory String (LDB_SYNTAX_DIRECTORY_STRING), but case sensitive. But according to ms docs binary compare should do the job: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc223200(v=PROT.10).aspx Autobuild-User: Kamen Mazdrashki <kamenim@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Fri Oct 22 22:19:50 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
2010-10-21s4-dsdb/schema_syntax: Separate validation for numericoid OID valuesKamen Mazdrashki1-3/+47
This implementation doesn't use prefixMap/Schema to validate numericoid OIDs. We may not have this OID yet, so I see no point checking schema for if we have it. Side effect of using prefixMap/Schema for validating numericoids is that we mistakenly add the OID to the prefixMap. This led to a corrupted prefixMap in LDB. Autobuild-User: Kamen Mazdrashki <kamenim@samba.org> Autobuild-Date: Thu Oct 21 23:32:26 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
2010-08-19s4-drs: ATTIDs for deleted attributes should be based on msDs-IntId value if ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-2/+2
it exists
2010-08-19s4-dsdb: No need for dsdb_syntax_one_DN_drsuapi_to_ldb() to be publicKamen Mazdrashki1-3/+3
It is intended to be used in schema_syntax.c module
2010-08-19s4-dsdb-syntax: ATTID should be msDs-IntId value for the attributeSchema objectKamen Mazdrashki1-14/+52
in case object replicated is not in Schema NC and attributeSchema object has msDs-IntId attribute value set
2010-08-19s4: fix few comment typosKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+1
2010-08-19s4-schema_syntax.c: Fix white spaces and alignmentKamen Mazdrashki1-55/+56
2010-08-19s4-dsdb: Use dsdb_syntax_ctx in *_drsuapi_to_ldb functionsKamen Mazdrashki1-53/+38
2010-08-19s4-dsdb: Use dsdb_syntax_ctx in *_ldb_to_drsuapi functionsKamen Mazdrashki1-51/+36
2010-08-19s4-dsdb: Use dsdb_syntax_ctx in *_validate_ldb functionsKamen Mazdrashki1-59/+35
2010-08-19s4-dsdb: Add context structure for dsdb_syntax conversion functionsKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+13
This structure is intended to hold context-dependent data. Syntax-conversion and object-conversion functions need that data to convert objects and attributes from drs-to-ldb and ldb-to-drs correctly. For instance: ATTID value depends on whether we are converting object from partition different that Schema partition.
2010-06-15s4:dsdb Allow the setting an override on the schemaAndrew Bartlett1-6/+20
The change here is to try and convert a per the previous rules, but if we don't know a particular OID as a attributeID, then store it as an OID (for example). This allows known values to be converted as before, but still copes with unknown values. Andrew Bartlett Signed-off-by: Kamen Mazdrashki <kamenim@samba.org>
2010-06-07s4:remove the "validate_update" LDB module - the task is now handled by the ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-13/+0
far more complete "objectclass_attrs" LDB module
2010-05-18s3: Remove use of iconv_convenience.Jelmer Vernooij1-2/+1
2010-05-18Finish removal of iconv_convenience in public API's.Jelmer Vernooij1-16/+12
2010-04-22s4-dsdb: added dsdb_get_extended_dn_sid()Andrew Tridgell1-12/+5
This will be used by the RODC code Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-03-07s4:schema_syntax.c - Change also here counters to "unsigned" where neededMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-44/+44
Counters which are used in the way "for (i = 0; array[i] != NULL; i++)" I modified to "unsigned" since for sure we don't want to have negative array indexes there. There were many counter variables typed "uint32_t". This isn't fully correct since those count LDB objects. The amount is saved in a "num_*" variable which is "unsigned" without a bitlength specification. Therefore change also these counters to be plain "unsigned".
2010-02-26s4:dsdb/schema: fix validation of DNsStefan Metzmacher1-1/+0
ldb_dn_extended_filter() removes all but the listed components, I didn't noticed that when writting the code. Doing a ldb_dn_remove_extended_components(dn2) is wrong. This was hidden by some bugs in the ldb_dn code. metze
2010-01-13s4:dsdb/schema: add dsdb_syntax_OID_validate_ldb()Stefan Metzmacher1-13/+50
This is a very heavy weight way of checking this syntax, but it's very complex and using the existing function should be ok for now. We can optimize it later. metze
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2024-11-01 17:04:58 +0000