Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
Most of the time this flag is not set and so we can avoid the strcasecmp
in ldb_attr_cmp()
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jan 17 17:10:32 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
This avoids one samba process locking out another from the DB.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This needs to be more async, and give less scary errors.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
acl_check_access_on_attribute should never be called with attr=NULL
because we don't check access on an attribute in that case
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
Autobuild-User(master): Matthieu Patou <mat@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Jan 17 11:21:10 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
|
|
First we check for a special dn, then for system access.
All allocations happen after this checks in order to avoid
allocations we won't use.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
|
|
shouldn't see
This fix frequent reindexing when using python script with a
user that is not system.
The reindexing is caused by ACL module hidding (removing) attributes in
the search request for all attributes in dn=@ATTRIBUTES and because
dsdb_schema_set_indices_and_attributes checks that the list of
attributes that it just calculated from the schema is the same as the
list written in @ATTRIBUTES, if not the list is replaced and a
reindexing is triggered.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthieu Patou <mat@matws.net>
|
|
(bug #9554 - CVE-2013-0172)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit 8bafe0871526cd5d5e7fdbe123ab661379f64cb1)
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Tue Jan 15 14:03:47 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
#9554 - CVE-2013-0172)
This seems inefficient, but is needed for correctness. The
alternative might be to have the sec_access_check_ds code confirm that
*all* of the nodes in the object tree have been cleared to
node->remaining_bits == 0.
Otherwise, I fear that write access to one attribute will become write
access to all attributes.
Andrew Bartlett
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
(cherry picked from commit d776fd807e0c9a62f428ce666ff812655f98bc47)
|
|
This ensures that when we have the backlink out of sync with the forward link (perhaps due
to another operation that has put the backlink handling in an end-of-transaction
TODO list in repl_meta_data) that we do not error out, we just cope as well as we can.
The GUID is the unique identifier, not the DN.
Andrew Bartlett
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Sat Jan 12 12:52:28 CET 2013 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Reviewed-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
The highwatermark is relative to the source_dsa_invocation_id.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
uptodatevector
This matches a Windows 2008R2 and 2012 server.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
We should use the global highestCommittedUSN, not the per partition value.
This matches a Windows 2008R2 and 2012 server.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
We should not do any magic regarding the highwatermark we got from
the source dsa. We need to treat it as opaque and not try to be smart
and merge it into the uptodatevector.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
This matches Windows 2008R2 and Windows 2012.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
Found by Coverity.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schneider <asn@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Günther Deschner <gd@samba.org>
|
|
Pair-Programmed-With: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
This should give the password_hash module a chance to detect if the called
was the cleartext password or not.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Honor password complexity settings when creating new users.
Without this patch, you could set simple passwords although the complexity
settings were enabled. This was an issue with 'samba-tool user add' and also
when adding new users via Windows' "Active Directory Users and Computers"
MMC Snap-In.
The following scenarios were tested successfully after applying the patch:
-'samba-tool user add' against s4
-'samba-tool user add -H' against a Windows DC
-Adding a new user on a s4 DC using Windows' "Active Directory Users and
Computers" MMC Snap-In.
Please note that this bug was caused by a mistake in the documentation.
Fix bug #9414 - 'samba-tool user add' ignores password complexity settings.
Pair-programmed-with: Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This reverts commit f8056b7a6998e002f473b0ad79eee046236a7032.
A better fix will follow.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
working
This is a regression test for bug #9470.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Mon Dec 10 15:41:12 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
interaction
This is a regression test for bug #9470.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
If the sd_flags control is specified, we should return nTSecurityDescriptor
only if the client asked for all attributes.
If there's a list of only explicit attribute names, we should ignore
the sd_flags control.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
control is given (bug #9470)
Not returning the nTSecurityDescriptor causes a lot of problems.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
The sub NC heads maybe replicated with the parent partition,
if we don't need to recalculate the nTSecurityDescriptor attribute in that
case, the replication of the of the sub partition should handle that.
This fixes error messages like this:
descriptor_sd_propagation_recursive: DC=ForestDnsZones,DC=s40dom,DC=base not found under DC=s40dom,DC=base
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Some modules might not allocate values on the correct memory context.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
msg->elements[i].values (bug #9470)
We should keep the talloc hierarchy sane.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
We should always update the ts_last_change.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Honor password complexity settings when creating new users.
Without this patch, you could set simple passwords although the complexity
settings were enabled. This was an issue with 'samba-tool user add' and also
when adding new users via Windows' "Active Directory Users and Computers"
MMC Snap-In.
The following scenarios were tested successfully after applying the patch:
-'samba-tool user add' against s4
-'samba-tool user add -H' against a Windows DC
-Adding a new user on a s4 DC using Windows' "Active Directory Users and
Computers" MMC Snap-In.
Please note that this bug was caused by a mistake in the documentation.
Fix bug #9414 - 'samba-tool user add' ignores password complexity settings.
Pair-programmed-with: Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Karolin Seeger <kseeger@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Thu Dec 6 05:11:43 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
A client can send a full security_descriptor while just passing
sd_flags of SECINFO_DACL.
We need to NULL out elements which will be ignored depending on
the sd_flags and may set the old owner/group sids. Otherwise
the calculation of the DACL/SACL can replace CREATOR_OWNER with
the wrong sid.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-User(master): Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date(master): Fri Nov 30 18:59:50 CET 2012 on sn-devel-104
|
|
replicated changes
We only do so if the replicated object is not deleted.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
This can only be triggered by ourself, that's why we expect
control->data == module.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Adam <obnox@samba.org>
|