summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/dsdb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2010-07-07s4-dsdb: use ldb_operr() in the dsdb codeAndrew Tridgell43-625/+455
this replaces "return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR" with "return ldb_operr(ldb)" in places in the dsdb code where we don't already explicitly set an error string. This should make is much easier to track down dsdb module bugs that result in an operations error.
2010-07-06s4:new_partition LDB module - fix an uninitalised variable warningMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-2/+1
> [ 651/1946] Compiling dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c > ../dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c: In function 'new_partition_add': > ../dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c:195: warning: 'down_req' may be used uninitialized in this function The "down_req" variable isn't used anymore.
2010-07-06s4:dsdb - samdb_result_force_password_change - also when "pwdLastSet" is ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-3/+9
"-1" we shouldn't force a password change This value is set by the ADUC console.
2010-07-05s4:dsdb/password_hash: implement DSDB_CONTROL_BYPASS_PASSWORD_HASH_OIDStefan Metzmacher1-0/+20
metze
2010-07-05s4:dsdb: allocate DSDB_CONTROL_BYPASS_PASSWORD_HASH_OIDStefan Metzmacher1-0/+5
When importing users from Samba3 we need to control all values. metze
2010-07-05s4:dsdb/password_hash: fix some c++ compiler warningsStefan Metzmacher1-9/+12
metze
2010-07-05Changed passwords.py to use the correct account as acl checks now pass.Nadezhda Ivanova1-14/+6
2010-07-05s4-dsdb: Implementation of User-Change-Password and User-Force-Password-ChangeNadezhda Ivanova2-85/+226
These CARs need to be checked on password change and password reset operations. Apparently the password attributes are not influenced by Write Property. Single detele operations and modifications of dBCSPwd are let through to the password_hash module. This is determined experimentally.
2010-07-04s4:subtree_rename LDB module - Cosmetic fixesMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-3/+4
2010-07-04s4:subtree_delete LDB module - fix comments and add my copyrightMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-2/+3
(I've introduced the subtree delete mechanism)
2010-07-03s4:dsdb/tests/python/ldap_schema.py - remove a now useless "schemaUpdateNow" ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-10/+0
request "schemaUpdateNow" on s4 is now a non-op and therefore not strictly needed anymore.
2010-07-03s4:urgent_replication.py test - remove unneeded "relax" control parametersMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-2/+2
2010-07-03s4:schema_load LDB module - fix a segfault condition on schema refreshMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-0/+5
The schema refresh operation itself starts requests from the top of the LDB modules stack (see call "dsdb_schema_set_attributes" - search operations). This doesn't work well when these do perform "dsdb_get_schema" calls. Since the new schema isn't marked as "refreshed" atm (but in fact it still is - we didn't terminate the reload/refresh yet) we could perform other calls to "dsdb_schema_refresh" and run into serious trouble (segfault).
2010-07-03s4:schema_set.c - Fix a commentMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+2
2010-07-03s4:dsdb_schema_set_attributes - remove unneeded filter criteriasMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-2/+4
We already choose the right entry by specifying the right basedn with scope "LDB_SCOPE_BASE".
2010-07-03s4:dsdb_module_load_partition_usn - check for "res->count" equal/unequal to 1Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+1
2010-07-03s4:schema_set.c - fix typoMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+3
2010-07-03s4:schema_load.c - jump to "failed" on an error conditionMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-3/+2
2010-07-03s4:dsdb/tests/passwords.py - set and reset the "minPwdAge" properlyMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-2/+21
After a patch proposal of Nadya and some reflection I think that it's really worth to change all tests which need a "0" "minPwdAge" to set it manually and reset the default afterwards. So we can finally introduce the default "minPwdAge" on provision. Patch proposal by: Nadya Ivanova
2010-07-02Tests for user-change-password and force-password-change access rightsNadezhda Ivanova1-4/+242
2010-07-02s4/schema: remove unnecessary deletion of dsdb_schema cached pointerAnatoliy Atanasov1-3/+0
This is needed so we can find and free old schemas based using the cached pointer
2010-07-02s4-dsdb: fixed spelling of supportedSASLMechanismsAndrew Tridgell1-1/+1
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4:dsdb Ensure we free old schema copiesAndrew Bartlett1-6/+25
It was reported by aatanasov that we kept around one whole schema per modification made. This does not fix that, but I hope moves us closer to a fix The most important part of the fix is that: - if (schema_out != schema_in) { - talloc_unlink(schema_in, ldb); - } was the wrong way around. This is now handled in the schema_set calls. Andrew Bartlett
2010-07-02s4/dsdb: Assert DSDB_FLAG_*_MODULE is always passed in function callKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+5
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/util.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_delete.c: Use ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-1/+3
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/schema_load.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+2
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-4/+5
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba3sid.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+3
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/rootdse.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/ridalloc.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c: Use ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-4/+5
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c: make use of ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-2/+2
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4/dsdb: Add DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+1
Although it is not currently used in implementation, my intention is for callers to clearly state what action they want to execute. Currently when a caller wants to pass the call to the next module in the chain, this flag is either omitted or 0 is used (which is somewhat hacky, isn't it) Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-01s4:dsdb/tests/python/passwords.py - add the right result codes for user ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+5
password changes They will be enabled once the ACL modules supports it. It was my fault to not import them earlier.
2010-06-30s4:dsdb: move dsdb python tests from lib/ldb/ to dsdb/Stefan Metzmacher8-0/+7680
metze
2010-06-30s4:schema/schema_set.c - free LDB message diffsAnatoliy Atanasov1-0/+2
Especially the "free"s after "ldb_msg_diff" are very important since the diff message is allocated on the long-living LDB context. Signed-off-by: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
2010-06-30s4:dsdb Fix possible schema segfaults for DRS-replication based schemaAndrew Bartlett1-17/+13
The problem here is that if the schema has been modified on the source domain, there may be attributes that appear over DRS with 0 values (to indicate that any existing values on the target should be deleted). This would confuse the previous version of this macro. Andrew Bartlett
2010-06-29s4:dsdb/new_partition.c - remove the "ldb_next_request" call which we find ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-3/+1
also below the "if" block
2010-06-29Revert "s4/dsdb: Fixed partition_search() not to pass special DN's to LDAP ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-8/+6
backend." This reverts commit ed4c107bc1eac8531fdd8d09f7698efcbc7ecb14. See post "Endi's Bug 7530 patches (LDAP backend)" on samba-technical.
2010-06-29Fixed incorrect use of cn instead of lDAPDisplayNameNadezhda Ivanova1-2/+2
2010-06-29s4:provision Add an msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes entry to our DCAndrew Bartlett1-1/+16
This ensures that our DC will use all the available encyption types. (The KDC reads this entry to determine what the server supports) Andrew Bartlett
2010-06-29s4/repl_meta_data: remove duplicated (and commented out) logKamen Mazdrashki1-6/+0
2010-06-28s4/dsdb: Fixed partition_search() not to pass special DN's to LDAP backend.Endi S. Dewata1-6/+8
Signed-off-by: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
2010-06-28s4:repl_meta_data LDB module - fix counter typeMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+1
2010-06-28s4:acl LDB module - fix counter typeMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+2
2010-06-28Implementation of self membership validated right.Nadezhda Ivanova2-1/+131
When this right is granted, the user can add or remove themselves from a group even if they dont have write property right.
2010-06-28s4/drs: re-implement 'renaming' object replicationKamen Mazdrashki1-18/+53
We should rename objects only after we make sure, that changes on the partner DC are newer than what we have. This fixes a bug, when we have following situation with 2 DCs: - we have an object O on the two DCs - we rename (delete) object O on DC1 - DC1 replicates from DC2 In the above scenario, object O will be renamed back to its original name (i.e. it will be restored). Now, we check that DC2 state is older than what we have, so nothing happens with object's DN.
2010-06-26s4:dsdb/ridalloc: add comment about windows behavior regarding rIDUsedPoolStefan Metzmacher1-1/+6
metze
2010-06-25s4/drs: DsReplicaSync should search partition to SyncKamen Mazdrashki2-6/+38
by any valid DSName attribute given, be it - partition DN, partition GUID or partition SID
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2024-11-08 04:42:26 +0000