Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb:ridalloc.c: fix C++ warning | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -1/+2 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb: add dsdb_module_constrainted_update_uint32/64() wrapper functions | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+22 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb: add dsdb_msg_constrainted_update_uint32/64() wrapper functions | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+22 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb: add dsdb_module_constrainted_update_int32/64() functions | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+58 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-09 | s4:dsdb: add dsdb_msg_constrainted_update_int32/64() functions | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+96 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4:acl LDB module - password attributes - check also the "dBCSPwd" attribute | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+2 | |
It's also a possible password change/set attribute candidate. | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4:acl LDB module - move a "mem_ctx" creation to the place where it is ↵ | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -1/+2 | |
actually checked Memory allocations and their result checks should be as tight as possible. | |||||
2010-07-08 | Added a test to prove by default users can change each other's pass if the ↵ | Nadezhda Ivanova | 1 | -0/+25 | |
old is known | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-dsdb/util: Reorder DSDB_FLAG_* checks | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -30/+30 | |
On good thing about having more clear function interfaces (and forcing callers to specify clearly what they want) is that now I can execute following search: git grep DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE | wc -l This showed that DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag is about 6 times more frequently used than DSDB_FLAG_OWN_MODULE. So this should reduce branch prediction by six times in this part of the code, right :) | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-dsdb: Implement module switching in dsdb_module_search_dn() | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+10 | |
This allows caller to choose from where to start DN search | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -5/+12 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c Use ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+4 | |
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/naming_fsmo.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+2 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/operational.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -3/+7 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/partition_init.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -3/+6 | |
flag | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/pdc_fsmo.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+2 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -3/+7 | |
flag | |||||
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/ridalloc.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -3/+6 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba_dsdb.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -2/+4 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/schema_load.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+2 | |
2010-07-08 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/util.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -2/+4 | |
2010-07-07 | s4-dsdb: use ldb_operr() in the dsdb code | Andrew Tridgell | 43 | -625/+455 | |
this replaces "return LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR" with "return ldb_operr(ldb)" in places in the dsdb code where we don't already explicitly set an error string. This should make is much easier to track down dsdb module bugs that result in an operations error. | |||||
2010-07-06 | s4:new_partition LDB module - fix an uninitalised variable warning | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+1 | |
> [ 651/1946] Compiling dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c > ../dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c: In function 'new_partition_add': > ../dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/new_partition.c:195: warning: 'down_req' may be used uninitialized in this function The "down_req" variable isn't used anymore. | |||||
2010-07-06 | s4:dsdb - samdb_result_force_password_change - also when "pwdLastSet" is ↵ | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -3/+9 | |
"-1" we shouldn't force a password change This value is set by the ADUC console. | |||||
2010-07-05 | s4:dsdb/password_hash: implement DSDB_CONTROL_BYPASS_PASSWORD_HASH_OID | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+20 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-05 | s4:dsdb: allocate DSDB_CONTROL_BYPASS_PASSWORD_HASH_OID | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -0/+5 | |
When importing users from Samba3 we need to control all values. metze | |||||
2010-07-05 | s4:dsdb/password_hash: fix some c++ compiler warnings | Stefan Metzmacher | 1 | -9/+12 | |
metze | |||||
2010-07-05 | Changed passwords.py to use the correct account as acl checks now pass. | Nadezhda Ivanova | 1 | -14/+6 | |
2010-07-05 | s4-dsdb: Implementation of User-Change-Password and User-Force-Password-Change | Nadezhda Ivanova | 2 | -85/+226 | |
These CARs need to be checked on password change and password reset operations. Apparently the password attributes are not influenced by Write Property. Single detele operations and modifications of dBCSPwd are let through to the password_hash module. This is determined experimentally. | |||||
2010-07-04 | s4:subtree_rename LDB module - Cosmetic fixes | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -3/+4 | |
2010-07-04 | s4:subtree_delete LDB module - fix comments and add my copyright | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+3 | |
(I've introduced the subtree delete mechanism) | |||||
2010-07-03 | s4:dsdb/tests/python/ldap_schema.py - remove a now useless "schemaUpdateNow" ↵ | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -10/+0 | |
request "schemaUpdateNow" on s4 is now a non-op and therefore not strictly needed anymore. | |||||
2010-07-03 | s4:urgent_replication.py test - remove unneeded "relax" control parameters | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+2 | |
2010-07-03 | s4:schema_load LDB module - fix a segfault condition on schema refresh | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -0/+5 | |
The schema refresh operation itself starts requests from the top of the LDB modules stack (see call "dsdb_schema_set_attributes" - search operations). This doesn't work well when these do perform "dsdb_get_schema" calls. Since the new schema isn't marked as "refreshed" atm (but in fact it still is - we didn't terminate the reload/refresh yet) we could perform other calls to "dsdb_schema_refresh" and run into serious trouble (segfault). | |||||
2010-07-03 | s4:schema_set.c - Fix a comment | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -1/+2 | |
2010-07-03 | s4:dsdb_schema_set_attributes - remove unneeded filter criterias | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+4 | |
We already choose the right entry by specifying the right basedn with scope "LDB_SCOPE_BASE". | |||||
2010-07-03 | s4:dsdb_module_load_partition_usn - check for "res->count" equal/unequal to 1 | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -1/+1 | |
2010-07-03 | s4:schema_set.c - fix typo | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -1/+3 | |
2010-07-03 | s4:schema_load.c - jump to "failed" on an error condition | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -3/+2 | |
2010-07-03 | s4:dsdb/tests/passwords.py - set and reset the "minPwdAge" properly | Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer | 1 | -2/+21 | |
After a patch proposal of Nadya and some reflection I think that it's really worth to change all tests which need a "0" "minPwdAge" to set it manually and reset the default afterwards. So we can finally introduce the default "minPwdAge" on provision. Patch proposal by: Nadya Ivanova | |||||
2010-07-02 | Tests for user-change-password and force-password-change access rights | Nadezhda Ivanova | 1 | -4/+242 | |
2010-07-02 | s4/schema: remove unnecessary deletion of dsdb_schema cached pointer | Anatoliy Atanasov | 1 | -3/+0 | |
This is needed so we can find and free old schemas based using the cached pointer | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-dsdb: fixed spelling of supportedSASLMechanisms | Andrew Tridgell | 1 | -1/+1 | |
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4:dsdb Ensure we free old schema copies | Andrew Bartlett | 1 | -6/+25 | |
It was reported by aatanasov that we kept around one whole schema per modification made. This does not fix that, but I hope moves us closer to a fix The most important part of the fix is that: - if (schema_out != schema_in) { - talloc_unlink(schema_in, ldb); - } was the wrong way around. This is now handled in the schema_set calls. Andrew Bartlett | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4/dsdb: Assert DSDB_FLAG_*_MODULE is always passed in function call | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -0/+5 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/util.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -2/+3 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_delete.c: Use ↵ | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+3 | |
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/schema_load.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+2 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -4/+5 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> | |||||
2010-07-02 | s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba3sid.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag | Kamen Mazdrashki | 1 | -1/+3 | |
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org> |