summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/dsdb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2010-07-02Tests for user-change-password and force-password-change access rightsNadezhda Ivanova1-4/+242
2010-07-02s4/schema: remove unnecessary deletion of dsdb_schema cached pointerAnatoliy Atanasov1-3/+0
This is needed so we can find and free old schemas based using the cached pointer
2010-07-02s4-dsdb: fixed spelling of supportedSASLMechanismsAndrew Tridgell1-1/+1
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4:dsdb Ensure we free old schema copiesAndrew Bartlett1-6/+25
It was reported by aatanasov that we kept around one whole schema per modification made. This does not fix that, but I hope moves us closer to a fix The most important part of the fix is that: - if (schema_out != schema_in) { - talloc_unlink(schema_in, ldb); - } was the wrong way around. This is now handled in the schema_set calls. Andrew Bartlett
2010-07-02s4/dsdb: Assert DSDB_FLAG_*_MODULE is always passed in function callKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+5
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/util.c Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/subtree_delete.c: Use ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-1/+3
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/schema_load.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+2
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samldb.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-4/+5
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/samba3sid.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+3
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/rootdse.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/ridalloc.c: Use DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+1
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/repl_meta_data.c: Use ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-4/+5
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4-dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/linked_attributes.c: make use of ↵Kamen Mazdrashki1-2/+2
DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flag Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-02s4/dsdb: Add DSDB_FLAG_NEXT_MODULE flagKamen Mazdrashki1-0/+1
Although it is not currently used in implementation, my intention is for callers to clearly state what action they want to execute. Currently when a caller wants to pass the call to the next module in the chain, this flag is either omitted or 0 is used (which is somewhat hacky, isn't it) Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-07-01s4:dsdb/tests/python/passwords.py - add the right result codes for user ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+5
password changes They will be enabled once the ACL modules supports it. It was my fault to not import them earlier.
2010-06-30s4:dsdb: move dsdb python tests from lib/ldb/ to dsdb/Stefan Metzmacher8-0/+7680
metze
2010-06-30s4:schema/schema_set.c - free LDB message diffsAnatoliy Atanasov1-0/+2
Especially the "free"s after "ldb_msg_diff" are very important since the diff message is allocated on the long-living LDB context. Signed-off-by: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
2010-06-30s4:dsdb Fix possible schema segfaults for DRS-replication based schemaAndrew Bartlett1-17/+13
The problem here is that if the schema has been modified on the source domain, there may be attributes that appear over DRS with 0 values (to indicate that any existing values on the target should be deleted). This would confuse the previous version of this macro. Andrew Bartlett
2010-06-29s4:dsdb/new_partition.c - remove the "ldb_next_request" call which we find ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-3/+1
also below the "if" block
2010-06-29Revert "s4/dsdb: Fixed partition_search() not to pass special DN's to LDAP ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-8/+6
backend." This reverts commit ed4c107bc1eac8531fdd8d09f7698efcbc7ecb14. See post "Endi's Bug 7530 patches (LDAP backend)" on samba-technical.
2010-06-29Fixed incorrect use of cn instead of lDAPDisplayNameNadezhda Ivanova1-2/+2
2010-06-29s4:provision Add an msDS-SupportedEncryptionTypes entry to our DCAndrew Bartlett1-1/+16
This ensures that our DC will use all the available encyption types. (The KDC reads this entry to determine what the server supports) Andrew Bartlett
2010-06-29s4/repl_meta_data: remove duplicated (and commented out) logKamen Mazdrashki1-6/+0
2010-06-28s4/dsdb: Fixed partition_search() not to pass special DN's to LDAP backend.Endi S. Dewata1-6/+8
Signed-off-by: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
2010-06-28s4:repl_meta_data LDB module - fix counter typeMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+1
2010-06-28s4:acl LDB module - fix counter typeMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+2
2010-06-28Implementation of self membership validated right.Nadezhda Ivanova2-1/+131
When this right is granted, the user can add or remove themselves from a group even if they dont have write property right.
2010-06-28s4/drs: re-implement 'renaming' object replicationKamen Mazdrashki1-18/+53
We should rename objects only after we make sure, that changes on the partner DC are newer than what we have. This fixes a bug, when we have following situation with 2 DCs: - we have an object O on the two DCs - we rename (delete) object O on DC1 - DC1 replicates from DC2 In the above scenario, object O will be renamed back to its original name (i.e. it will be restored). Now, we check that DC2 state is older than what we have, so nothing happens with object's DN.
2010-06-26s4:dsdb/ridalloc: add comment about windows behavior regarding rIDUsedPoolStefan Metzmacher1-1/+6
metze
2010-06-25s4/drs: DsReplicaSync should search partition to SyncKamen Mazdrashki2-6/+38
by any valid DSName attribute given, be it - partition DN, partition GUID or partition SID
2010-06-24s4-python: python is not always in /usr/binAndrew Tridgell2-2/+2
Using "#!/usr/bin/env python" is more portable. It still isn't ideal though, as we should really use the python path found at configure time. We do that in many places already, but some don't. Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
2010-06-23libds:common Remove DS_DC_* domain functionality flagsAndrew Bartlett1-10/+0
These are just a subset of the DS_DOMAIN_ functionality flags, are compared and often confused with each other. Just make them one set. Andrew Bartlett
2010-06-23s4:operational LDB module - fix a misleading commentMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-1/+2
2010-06-22s4:password_hash LDB module - fix another problem regarding the lanman hashMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-13/+16
When a user only provides only the lanman hash (and nothing else) and the lanman authentication is deactivated then we end in an account with no password attribute at all! Lock this down.
2010-06-21s4:dsdb_load_partition_usn - free the right memory context (tmp_ctx)Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-2/+1
2010-06-21s4/dsdb: msg_idx->dn should be allocated in msg_idx mem contextKamen Mazdrashki1-1/+1
2010-06-21s4/dsdb: Move schema accessors cleanup in separate functionKamen Mazdrashki1-18/+21
This way dsdb_setup_sorted_accessors() will free memory allocated for accessor arrays correctly in case of failure,
2010-06-21s4/dsdb-schema: Index attributes on msDS-IntId valueKamen Mazdrashki3-7/+28
O(n) search for dsdb_attribute by msDS-IntId value was replaced by binary-search in ordered index. I've choosen the approach of separate index on msDS-IntId values as I think it is more clear what we are searching for. And it should little bit faster as we can clearly determine in which index to perform the search based on ATTID value - ATTIDs based on prefixMap and ATTIDs based on msDS-IntId are in separate ranges. Other way to implement this index was to merge msDS-IntId values in attributeID_id index. This led me to a shorted but not so obvious implementation.
2010-06-20s4:subtree_delete LDB module - now do support tree delete operationsMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-9/+45
2010-06-20s4:dsdb - add a new dsdb delete function which understands the tree delete ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer3-2/+62
control
2010-06-20s4:samldb LDB module - remove "samldb_set_defaultObjectCategory"Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-78/+0
As far as I can tell and the test show the DN gets now normalised automatically when stored into the database. Anyway, if we find a case where this doesn't happen then I propose to do it centrally for all DN attributes in common since we should get away from special attribute hacks as far as possible.
2010-06-20pydsdb: Mark all SamDB and Schema methods that are in pydsdb asJelmer Vernooij1-15/+15
private, to discourage them being called directly.
2010-06-20s4: Using control bypassoperational allow the logic of this module to be ↵Matthieu Patou1-10/+39
bypassed for some given attributes Signed-off-by: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
2010-06-19pydsdb: Move write_prefixes_from_schema_to_ldb to pydsdb from pyglue.Jelmer Vernooij1-0/+26
2010-06-19pydsdb: Move dsdb_set_schema_from_ldb to pydsdb.Jelmer Vernooij1-0/+31
2010-06-19pydsdb: Move set_schema_from_ldif function to pydsdb from pyglue.Jelmer Vernooij1-0/+20
2010-06-19s4:instancetype LDB module - "instanceType" is single-valued - MS-ADTS ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-2/+12
3.1.1.5.2.2
2010-06-19s4:objectclass LDB module - disable delete operations when ↵Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-5/+80
"SYSTEM_FLAG_DISALLOW_DELETE" is specified
2010-06-19s4:rootdse LDB module - strip trailing whitespacesMatthias Dieter Wallnöfer1-24/+24
generated by cgit (git 2.34.1) at 2024-11-04 03:12:20 +0000