| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
complexity was that events didn't automatically cleanup
themselves. This was because the events code was written before we had
talloc destructors, so you needed to call event_remove_XX() to clean
the event out of the event lists from every piece of code that used
events. I have now added automatic event destructors, which in turn
allowed me to simplify a lot of the calling code.
The 2nd source of complexity was caused by the ref_count, which was
needed to cope with event handlers destroying events while handling
them, which meant the linked lists became invalid, so the ref_count ws
used to mark events for later destruction.
The new system is much simpler. I now have a ev->destruction_count,
which is incremented in all event destructors. The event dispatch code
checks for changes to this and handles it.
(This used to be commit a3c7417cfeab429ffb22d5546b205818f531a7b4)
|
|
(This used to be commit e76d486b04ee114087a69a659fbc47e585e71510)
|
|
deferred reply is short-circuited immediately when the file is
closed by another user, allowing it to be opened by the waiting user.
- added a sane set of timeval manipulation routines
- converted all the events code and code that uses it to use struct
timeval instead of time_t, which allows for microsecond resolution
instead of 1 second resolution. This was needed for doing the pvfs
deferred open code, and is why the patch is so big.
(This used to be commit 0d51511d408d91eb5f68a35e980e0875299b1831)
|
|
(This used to be commit 1cef44505e5de9b8ae5206522b624082ad2343b2)
|
|
Up to now the client code has had an async API, and operated
asynchronously at the packet level, but was not truly async in that it
assumed that it could always write to the socket and when a partial
packet came in that it could block waiting for the rest of the packet.
This change makes the SMB client library full async, by adding a
separate outgoing packet queue, using non-blocking socket IO and
having a input buffer that can fill asynchonously until the full
packet has arrived.
The main complexity was in dealing with the events structure when
using the CIFS proxy backend. In that case the same events structure
needs to be used in both the client library and the main smbd server,
so that when the client library is waiting for a reply that the main
server keeps processing packets. This required some changes in the
events library code.
Next step is to make the generated rpc client code use these new
capabilities.
(This used to be commit 96bf4da3edc4d64b0f58ef520269f3b385b8da02)
|
|
metze
(This used to be commit af6f1f8a01bebbecd99bc8c066519e89966e65e3)
|
|
(This used to be commit b0510b5428b3461aeb9bbe3cc95f62fc73e2b97f)
|
