| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
deferred reply is short-circuited immediately when the file is
closed by another user, allowing it to be opened by the waiting user.
- added a sane set of timeval manipulation routines
- converted all the events code and code that uses it to use struct
timeval instead of time_t, which allows for microsecond resolution
instead of 1 second resolution. This was needed for doing the pvfs
deferred open code, and is why the patch is so big.
(This used to be commit 0d51511d408d91eb5f68a35e980e0875299b1831)
|
|
(This used to be commit cc93813e4a09c538ad485dc2b3cb4c9be34f3d18)
|
|
This adds a pvfs_wait_message() routine which uses the new messaging
system, event timers and talloc destructors to give a nice generic
async event handling system with a easy to use interface. The
extensions to pvfs_lock.c are based on calls to pvfs_wait_message()
routines.
We now pass all of our smbtorture locking tests, although while
writing this code I have thought of some additonal tests that should
be added, particularly for lock cancel operations. I'll work on that
soon.
This commit also extends the smbtorture lock tests to test the rather
weird 0xEEFFFFFF locking semantics that I have discovered in
win2003. Win2003 treats the 0xEEFFFFFF boundary as special, and will
give different error codes on either side of it. Locks on both sides
are allowed, the only difference is which error code is given when a
lock is denied. Anyone like to hazard a guess as to why? It has
me stumped.
(This used to be commit 4395c0557ab175d6a8dd99df03c266325949ffa5)
|
|
(This used to be commit b0510b5428b3461aeb9bbe3cc95f62fc73e2b97f)
|
