| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
(This used to be commit a88ab4fa3a07c31bc45c612043f9e096f384eda4)
|
|
(This used to be commit a0ff739bcab32065d9d3957eb1d93f7791f84f04)
|
|
in-memory
mirrors of the hash chain locks to a dynamically allocated one.
Jeremy, I count on you to revert it if the build farm freaks out, it's after
midnight here :-)
Volker
(This used to be commit 7b5db2e472c7e27231fa432d3930789e708abd09)
|
|
call which does a read lock on all chains. These will be used to make
ldb searches more efficient
(This used to be commit de664ec1f8cf179f1d650563272c0de3f7636e2b)
|
|
emacs compile mode (hint, paste to a file, and compile as "cat
filename").
This allowed me to fix nearly all the warnings for a IA_64 SuSE build
very quickly.
(This used to be commit eba6c84efff735bb0ca941ac4b755ce2b0591667)
|
|
as part of ldb.
This allows tdb failures to be passed all the way up to Samba's DEBUG
system, which allowed easier debugging.
Unfortunately I had to extend the tdb API, as the logging function
didn't have a context pointer.
I've worked over the 'debug levels' in TDB. Most of them were 0,
which didn't seem right, as some were trace-like messages. We didn't
see any of these previously, except when accessing TDB directly.
Andrew Bartlett
(This used to be commit 58898092c1ce043f6d698db5065f372b79109e22)
|
|
- print length of failed locks
(This used to be commit 11739ad31d7b3e1cf94ebf395608647e341257c4)
|
|
- if the lock upgrade loop ever fails then log a warning
(This used to be commit 1b03c4e6c7e89452a835ef5ff39c07f58b715a22)
|
|
EDEADLK even when progress can be made. This is not a good solution,
but I can't find anything better.
(This used to be commit 980dd17f7d0a622cd772afc9ba15e50007ad9c6e)
|
|
don't end up doing a mmap read only
(This used to be commit 294ccfd46a0c4e1af9365d028acdabec03c41ad3)
|
|
allowing searches to proceed while another process is in a
transaction, then only upgrading the transaction lock to a write lock
on commit.
The solution is:
- split tdb_traverse() into two calls, called tdb_traverse() and
tdb_traverse_read(). The _read() version only gets read locks, and
will fail any write operations made in the callback from the
traverse.
- the normal tdb_traverse() call allows for read or write operations
in the callback, but gets the transaction lock, preventing
transastions from starting inside the traverse
In addition we enforce the following rule that you may not start a
transaction within a traverse callback, although you can start a
traverse within a transaction
With these rules in place I believe all the deadlock possibilities are
removed, and we can now allow for searches to happen in parallel with
transactions
(This used to be commit 7dd31288a701d772e45b1960ac4ce4cc1be782ed)
|
|
samba-technical posting for more details on the transactions design.
This also adds a number of command line arguments to tdbtorture,
making it more flexible, and fixes some lock deadlock conditions in
the tdbtorture code.
(This used to be commit 06bd8abba942ec9f1e23f5c5d546cbb71ca3a701)
|
|
just involves splitting up the core tdb.c code into separate files on
logical boundaries, but there are some minor functional changes as well:
- move the 'struct tdb_context' into tdb_private.h, hiding it from
users. This was done to allow the structure to change without
breaking code that uses tdb.
- added accessor functions tdb_fd(), tdb_name(), and tdb_log_fn() to
access the elements of struct tdb_context that were used by
external code but are no longer visible
- simplied tdb_append() to use tdb_fetch()/tdb_store(), which is just
as good due to the way tdb locks work
- changed some of the types (such as tdb_off to tdb_off_t) to make
syntax highlighting work better
- removed the old optional spinlock code. It was a bad idea.
- fixed a bug in tdb_reopen_all() that caused tdbtorture to sometimes
fail or report nasty looking errors. This is the only real bug
fixed in this commit. Jeremy/Jerry, you might like to pickup this
change for Samba3, as that could definately affect smbd in
Samba3.
The aim of all of these changes is to make the tdb
transactions/journaling code I am working on easier to write. I
started to write it on top of the existing tdb.c code and it got very
messy. Splitting up the code makes it much easier to follow.
There are more cleanups we could do in tdb, such as using uint32_t
instead of u32 (suggested by metze). I'll leave those for another day.
(This used to be commit 4673cdd0d261614e707b72a7a348bb0e7dbb2482)
|
