| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
(This used to be commit 5f1d52f232051324082b840f29dd7719a9328bd5)
|
|
for an extremely lightweight test to see if a tdb has possibly
changed.
(This used to be commit f325ba605ccceca63712c0f2c98961e35e437b3d)
|
|
It doesn't fully work yet, and doesn't yet have all the efficiency
that is planned, but it doesn't break anything and I wanted to get the
code in the tree to minimise the chance of collisions with the work
metze is doing.
(This used to be commit 1624ea88e6eef89caacc36e7513aa79df0d579b9)
|
|
This patch changes the way lsb_search is called and the meaning of the returned integer.
The last argument of ldb_search is changed from struct ldb_message to struct ldb_result
which contains a pointer to a struct ldb_message list and a count of the number of messages.
The return is not the count of messages anymore but instead it is an ldb error value.
I tryed to keep the patch as tiny as possible bu as you can guess I had to change a good
amount of places. I also tried to double check all my changes being sure that the calling
functions would still behave as before. But this patch is big enough that I fear some bug
may have been introduced anyway even if it passes the test suite. So if you are currently
working on any file being touched please give it a deep look and blame me for any error.
Simo.
(This used to be commit 22c8c97e6fb466b41859e090e959d7f1134be780)
|
|
allowing searches to proceed while another process is in a
transaction, then only upgrading the transaction lock to a write lock
on commit.
The solution is:
- split tdb_traverse() into two calls, called tdb_traverse() and
tdb_traverse_read(). The _read() version only gets read locks, and
will fail any write operations made in the callback from the
traverse.
- the normal tdb_traverse() call allows for read or write operations
in the callback, but gets the transaction lock, preventing
transastions from starting inside the traverse
In addition we enforce the following rule that you may not start a
transaction within a traverse callback, although you can start a
traverse within a transaction
With these rules in place I believe all the deadlock possibilities are
removed, and we can now allow for searches to happen in parallel with
transactions
(This used to be commit 7dd31288a701d772e45b1960ac4ce4cc1be782ed)
|
|
samba-technical posting for more details on the transactions design.
This also adds a number of command line arguments to tdbtorture,
making it more flexible, and fixes some lock deadlock conditions in
the tdbtorture code.
(This used to be commit 06bd8abba942ec9f1e23f5c5d546cbb71ca3a701)
|
|
just involves splitting up the core tdb.c code into separate files on
logical boundaries, but there are some minor functional changes as well:
- move the 'struct tdb_context' into tdb_private.h, hiding it from
users. This was done to allow the structure to change without
breaking code that uses tdb.
- added accessor functions tdb_fd(), tdb_name(), and tdb_log_fn() to
access the elements of struct tdb_context that were used by
external code but are no longer visible
- simplied tdb_append() to use tdb_fetch()/tdb_store(), which is just
as good due to the way tdb locks work
- changed some of the types (such as tdb_off to tdb_off_t) to make
syntax highlighting work better
- removed the old optional spinlock code. It was a bad idea.
- fixed a bug in tdb_reopen_all() that caused tdbtorture to sometimes
fail or report nasty looking errors. This is the only real bug
fixed in this commit. Jeremy/Jerry, you might like to pickup this
change for Samba3, as that could definately affect smbd in
Samba3.
The aim of all of these changes is to make the tdb
transactions/journaling code I am working on easier to write. I
started to write it on top of the existing tdb.c code and it got very
messy. Splitting up the code makes it much easier to follow.
There are more cleanups we could do in tdb, such as using uint32_t
instead of u32 (suggested by metze). I'll leave those for another day.
(This used to be commit 4673cdd0d261614e707b72a7a348bb0e7dbb2482)
|
|
(This used to be commit 7548a5012aad41bde0652d4532d184545997be86)
|
|
(This used to be commit 9ea601c0a675767f8ea5f316c9355572dffbc4c0)
|
|
(This used to be commit 1ee84e373e2b44c96f9353f194b766d6a144e7ce)
|
|
(This used to be commit dbb56e9a59cf00d57b09ded6d60bf9424d5f1f4c)
|
|
- removed the u32 hack in events.c as I think this was only needed as
tdb.h defines u32. Metze, can you check that this hack is indeed no
longer needed on your suse system?
(This used to be commit 6f79432fe656164d4770dbce114a30dda5e7bf9a)
|
|
metze
(This used to be commit 1c48c30aaf58d069cdba2f59b5c012bc4bdd3efc)
|
|
they have been broken for 4 years (ever since they were added) and
have been never used, which makes them prime candidates for
destruction.
(This used to be commit 0b53ab85aae4569c04495f07c18a65fd6b47bf4c)
|
|
(This used to be commit 0d5af5b70bd010e7107b18f73a4b899e05c4f025)
|
|
convert a ... varargs function to a va_list by just a cast!!)
also mark the tdb log function with PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE() and fixed some
bad format errors in tdb.c that jim found.
(This used to be commit c26c92eb8f538748fcbb2ae5a0a8a02bffbbbf86)
|
|
Jeremy.
(This used to be commit b43320ee5c9ac14c330e61ae62e0786b088e04fa)
|
|
- #include <stdint.h>
- uint_t isn't a valid type, change back to unsigned int
(This used to be commit f690325565d2393bba3cb9f6e7cdf3753cbd4423)
|
|
metze
(This used to be commit 18062d2ed9fc9224c43143c10efbf2f6f1f5bbe0)
|
|
metze
(This used to be commit bacab322ce89979f0ad0811cd15b73d81eceb69d)
|
