Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
rename the core structure to composite_context and the wait routine to
composite_wait() (suggestion from metze)
(This used to be commit cf11d05e35179c2c3e51c5ab370cd0a3fb15f24a)
|
|
one place. This makes the code more robust, and simpler (it would have
prevented the error that volker found).
(This used to be commit 420b53091ee784d7891fb62d48e2f5a225b4dbf8)
|
|
it is freed. The problem is that the handler might complete the
request, and called the c->async.fn() async handler. That handler
might free the request handle.
(This used to be commit c4faceadc74e0849f6197ccbec9952f6c94f6176)
|
|
interface. This patch removes the "stage" variable, which is really
better suited to the backend state structures
(This used to be commit 39da684ea8bc72d7a4a12c00eaad56b4f32890a9)
|
|
pointers in the composite code type safe.
This is a bit of an experiement, I'd be interested in comments on
whether we should use this more widely.
(This used to be commit 0e1da827b380998355f75f4ef4f424802059c278)
|
|
the minimal level I think (one private pointer for the composite
function, and one private pointer for the caller)
(This used to be commit 0240bf928163e32e7c69be88fe3ed4987dd18778)
|
|
proliferation of void* in the composite code. This removes two of the
void* pointers from the main composite structure.
(This used to be commit 5a89a5ed0fa022fb380bf72065904633270f34aa)
|
|
have composite functions that are not made up of functions that
operate on smbcli_request structures.
(This used to be commit 4f6055b4fb7e287a29544ff1ca4e22f698efc478)
|
|
suite a little
(This used to be commit ef4dbc443dbdebc4160209ed3f23cbb97109c414)
|