Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
(This used to be commit a953d4a42c8fa3fe930c319d5157fc406a1035da)
|
|
anything yet, but will soon be the core of the shares modes code.
(This used to be commit ad1edabf95c6c331aac4f0caa7d31193e26bc176)
|
|
- converted the tid handling to use a idtree instead of bitmaps
(This used to be commit 4220914179d10132057216650b65ed7f7679717e)
|
|
an extremely efficient way of mapping from an integer handle (such as
an open file handle) to a pointer (such as the structure containing
the open file information). The code is taken from lib/idr.c in the
2.6 Linux kernel, and is very fast and space efficient. By using
talloc it even has auto cleanup.
This commit converts the handling of open file handles and open
directory search handles to use the idtree routines. In combination
with talloc destructors, this simplifies the structure handling in the
pvfs backend a lot. For example, we no longer need to keep a linked
list of open directory searches at all, and we no longer need to do
linear scans of the list of open files on most operations.
The end result is that the pvfs code is now extremely scalable. You
can have 10s of thousands of open files and open searches and the code
still runs very fast.
I have also added a small optimisation into the file close path, to
avoid looking in the byte range locking database if we know that there
are no locks outstanding.
(This used to be commit 16835a0ef91a16fa01145b773aad8d43da215dbf)
|
|
This adds a pvfs_wait_message() routine which uses the new messaging
system, event timers and talloc destructors to give a nice generic
async event handling system with a easy to use interface. The
extensions to pvfs_lock.c are based on calls to pvfs_wait_message()
routines.
We now pass all of our smbtorture locking tests, although while
writing this code I have thought of some additonal tests that should
be added, particularly for lock cancel operations. I'll work on that
soon.
This commit also extends the smbtorture lock tests to test the rather
weird 0xEEFFFFFF locking semantics that I have discovered in
win2003. Win2003 treats the 0xEEFFFFFF boundary as special, and will
give different error codes on either side of it. Locks on both sides
are allowed, the only difference is which error code is given when a
lock is denied. Anyone like to hazard a guess as to why? It has
me stumped.
(This used to be commit 4395c0557ab175d6a8dd99df03c266325949ffa5)
|
|
enough for us to pass locktest, but does not yet support lock timeouts
and some of the other esoteric features.
(This used to be commit 58a92abd88f190bc60894a68e0528e95ae33fe39)
|
|
(This used to be commit dac00ef3b0d0f8467367d7b6ff77db7b63a042cc)
|
|
(recently Linux systems support this, allowing us to support the
full resolution in NTTIME)
- use nanosecond resolution in the posix backend if available
- moved the configure tests and list of object files for the posix
backend into ntvfs/posix/ to keep them more neatlly separated.
(This used to be commit d92ad9f307fe16a3b253a0555b437f14c94b4dd7)
|