Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
The reason for this is that some systems include
<rpc/rpc.h> from within system headers. HP-UX 11.00
does so somewhere deep inside of <shadow.h>.
For torture/winbind/struct_based.c <rpc/rpc.h> resolves
to torture/rpc/rpc.h and breaks the build.
metze
|
|
|
|
Upstream subunit makes a ":" after commands optional, so I've fixed any
places where we might trigger commands accidently. I've filed a bug
about this in subunit.
|
|
|
|
this failed to compile on solaris8 with cc
|
|
|
|
a CONNECTION_RESET is now the normal "client disconnect" status code
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
Two new torture parameters:
* smbexit_pdu_support: if the Server supports the Exit command
* range_not_locked_on_file_close: whether the server returns the
NT_STATUS_RANGE_NOT_LOCKED error when a file is closed which has a
pending lock request. Windows returns this error, though per the
spec, this error should only be returned to an unlock request.
|
|
directories as files
|
|
Cleanup path should unlock, not cancel existing locked range.
|
|
* Test the SMB1 behavior when multiple lock ranges are requested, pend,
and then are cancelled. The entire LockingAndX request fails.
|
|
|
|
break behavior
|
|
Share modes are tested elsewhere, and there is currently an outstanding
issue about share mode contention for nt-passthrough levels:
http://lists.samba.org/archive/cifs-protocol/2009-December/001227.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
different from the base file
|
|
stream with an open handle
A normal file overwrite in this case would return NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED,
but if a stream is the target NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER is returned.
|
|
the check.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
by the server
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
This is needed as we want to mark failing tests as
known failures.
metze
|
|
Don't check SEC_DESC_DACL_AUTO_INHERITED right now
Disable RAW-ACLS-INHERITFLAGS for the short term
Update samba4's knownfail accordingly
|
|
It appears some newer versions of windows return
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND on a createfile when access is denied
rather than NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. I'm not sure how this translates
to directory enumeration yet, but for now make this a parameter that
can be checked in the various torture tests.
This also gets RAW-ACLS and SMB2-CREATE passing against win7.
|
|
- Change RAW-ACLS test suite so each test can be run individually.
- Add verify_sd() and verify_attrib() helper functions.
- Change test_nttrans_create() to work for both files and directories.
- Fix a segfault in test_inheritance() when the test errors out early.
- test_sd_get_set() does not pass against XP or Vista, so it is no longer added
to the RAW-ACLS test suite.
- Minor fixes to test_inheritance().
- New INHERITFLAGS test, which tests the auto inheritance flags a bit more.
- printf -> torture_comment / torture_warning / torture_result
|
|
monolithic test
|
|
|
|
|
|
error on failure
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Try a rename with a wide-open share mode on an already open file
and the there is still share mode contention. For the reason why
see:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/os_fileservices/thread/3ca14dc9-da1f-4786-a8f7-a86e9903db0c
Msft's anser:
After further review, The reason for server to fail with sharing
violation is that the windows server that executes a path-based
rename request opens the file for DELETE access, but only with
FILE_SHARED_READ as ShareAccess . Therefore, the existing
open(frame 76), which has shared read/write/delete , is compatible
with the Windows servers access mode (DELETE), but Windows servers
open is not compatible with access mode in existing open.
Note that it is correct to state that the logic in Windows server
could have been written to allow shared read/write/delete in which
case it would succeed as you mention. The behavior here is
historical based on the existing implementation.
|
|
|
|
Some servers choose to mark a client as bad if they fail an oplock
break request by timing out (win7 is an example). Once the client is
marked as bad, future oplock requests will timeout instantly. This
causes subsequent runs of this test to fail, so rather than erroring
out as a failure, a warning is printed instead.
There is also a bug in w2k3 where it was incorrectly returning
contending a share mode lock. It worked in XP and has been re-fixed
in win7.
This can also now be run against samba3.
|
|
|