summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/source4/torture/rpc/remote_pac.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2009-02-13Remove useless invocation of messaging_init() in RPC-PAC testAndrew Bartlett1-9/+0
2009-02-13Remove auth/ntlm as a dependency of GENSEC by means of function pointers.Andrew Bartlett1-1/+1
When starting GENSEC on the server, the auth subsystem context must be passed in, which now includes function pointers to the key elements. This should (when the other dependencies are fixed up) allow GENSEC to exist as a client or server library without bundling in too much of our server code. Andrew Bartlett
2008-11-02Add gensec_settings structure. This wraps loadparm_context for now, butJelmer Vernooij1-2/+5
should in the future only contain some settings required for gensec.
2008-10-29s4-netlogon: merge netr_LogonSamLogon{Ex,WithFlags} from s3 idl.Günther Deschner1-8/+26
Guenther
2008-09-23RPC-PAC: loop in gensec_update() untill the server side is readyStefan Metzmacher1-5/+1
metze
2008-09-22Remove unused variableAndrew Bartlett1-2/+0
2008-09-22This torture test and skipping of the server-side check was bogus.Andrew Bartlett1-49/+0
The IDL is declared to force the MessageType to 3 on output, so we instead checked the same thing 255 times... Andrew Bartlett
2008-09-03Test a few more error cases in RPC-PACAndrew Bartlett1-2/+179
(This used to be commit 50502b3b8faf89cf5ad396102f4fe80eaa213908)
2008-08-29It turns out that the Netlogon PAC verification is encrypted.Andrew Bartlett1-1/+3
This test now passes against Win2k3, and a implementation in the Samba4 server should follow shortly. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit c6b8ba893dd3ed90bca32c0ae89fd33be729c238)
2008-08-28Further rework the RPC-PAC test.Andrew Bartlett1-34/+15
This would seem to match the documentation requirements for the PAC verfication over NETLOGON, but I can't get Win2k3 to accept it so far. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit acfa87f3411a61bdd9066fbbba2bcfbe2a60cbbe)
2008-08-27Add a test to explore Netlogon PAC validationAndrew Bartlett1-0/+220
However, I have still not figured out this protocol yet, and the docs are rather unclear... :-( Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit d878643071a1477435a267e2944461d367cdfa79)