Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
This is consistent with the test names used by selftest, should
make the names less confusing and easier to integrate with other tools.
Autobuild-User: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sat Dec 11 04:16:13 CET 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
Autobuild-User: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer <mdw@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sun Nov 28 17:22:54 CET 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
The signed/unsignedness does match (always unsigned). The bitlength (64 bit) on
all regular platforms does also. Therefore simply add a cast to
"unsigned long long".
|
|
The new waf-based build system now has all the same functionality, and
the old build system has been broken for quite some time.
Autobuild-User: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Autobuild-Date: Sun Oct 31 02:01:44 UTC 2010 on sn-devel-104
|
|
the lock structure had uninitialised elements, so we sent a random
length.
This also adds a 1 byte write, so there is real data that is being
truncated with the 2nd open
|
|
Match MS-SMB2 - 2.2.1.1 SMB2 Packet Header - ASYNC
|
|
the merged variant is renamed to smb_msleep as some platforms already have a
msleep function.
|
|
this converts all callers that use the Samba4 loadparm lp_ calling
convention to use the lpcfg_ prefix.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
we were not initialising the whole array
Pair-Programmed-With: Rusty Russell <rusty@samba.org>
Pair-Programmed-With: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
Upstream subunit makes a ":" after commands optional, so I've fixed any
places where we might trigger commands accidently. I've filed a bug
about this in subunit.
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
|
|
we won't be using the mk -> wscript generator again
|
|
them
|
|
Rewrote wafsamba using a new dependency handling system, and started
adding the waf test code
|
|
|
|
These tests server behavior when a client compounds both synchronous
and asynchronous requests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signed-off-by: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
|
|
|
|
It appears some newer versions of windows return
NT_STATUS_OBJECT_NAME_NOT_FOUND on a createfile when access is denied
rather than NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED. I'm not sure how this translates
to directory enumeration yet, but for now make this a parameter that
can be checked in the various torture tests.
This also gets RAW-ACLS and SMB2-CREATE passing against win7.
|
|
Remove it for now
|
|
- The smblsa calls had to be commented out for now and should be fixed
later, but they aren't crucial to the test.
- The first two tests from RAW-ACLS were already ported to
torture_smb2_setinfo() and test_create_acl(). Modifications were
made similar to the RAW-ACLS changes.
- test_sd_get_set() was ported, but does not pass against XP or Vista;
it is not added to the SMB2-ACLS test suite.
- printf -> torture_comment / torture_warning / torture_result
|
|
- Add a torture_setup_dir() equivalent in SMB2, called smb2_util_setup_dir().
- Add verify_sd() and verify_attrib() helper functions for SMB2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* test that 2 locks in a single LockAndX are transactional
* test that 1 unlock and 1 lock in a single LockAndX are not
transactional
* test that SMB2 doesn't like mixed lock/unlock in a single
PDU
|
|
in multiple files
|
|
s4 returns NETWORK_NAME_DELETED if you attempt to use an invalid tree connection
for a lock. This test (correctly I think) happens before we validate the file handle.
That implies that when you pass both a closed handle and a invalid tree you
should get NT_STATUS_NETWORK_NAME_DELETED.
|
|
I think the error/success codes returned by windows for these tests
are quite bogus. The ones s4 gives are much more reasonable. The
locking ones returning NT_STATUS_SUCCESS could lead to data loss, as
an application thinks it has a file locked correctly when it fact it
doesn't, so it could do an unsafe modify.
|
|
|
|
RAW-LOCK ported as:
RAW-LOCK-LOCK, RAW-LOCK-LOCKX -> SMB2-LOCK-LOCK
RAW-PIDHIGH -> removed, no longer relevant
RAW-ASYNC -> SMB2-LOCK-ASYNC, SMB2-LOCK-CANCEL, SMB2-LOCK-CANCEL-TDIS, SMB2-LOCK-CANCEL-LOGOFF
RAW-ERRORCODE -> SMB2-LOCK-ERRORCODE
RAW-CHANGETYPE -> removed, no longer relevant
RAW-ZEROBYTELOCKS -> SMB2-LOCK->ZEROBYTELENGTH
RAW-UNLOCK -> SMB2-LOCK-UNLOCK
RAW-MULTIPLE_UNLOCK -> SMB2-LOCK-MULTIPLE-UNLOCK
RAW-STACKING -> SMB2-LOCK-STACKING
BASE-LOCK ported as:
BASE-LOCK-LOCK1 -> SMB2-LOCK-ERRORCODE, timeout is no longer relevant
BASE-LOCK-LOCK2 -> SMB2-LOCK-CONTEND, SMB2-LOCK-LOCK, SMB2-LOCK-CONTEXT
BASE-LOCK-LOCK3 -> SMB2-LOCK-RANGE
BASE-LOCK-LOCK4 -> SMB2-LOCK-OVERLAP
BASE-LOCK-LOCK5 -> SMB2-LOCK-STACKING
BASE-LOCK-LOCK6 -> SMB2-LOCK-CANCEL, change_locktype no longer relevant
BASE-LOCK-LOCK7 -> SMB2-LOCK-RW-SHARED, SMB2-LOCK-RW-EXCLUSIVE
|
|
The lock.in.reserved field has been renamed lock_sequence in the
SMB 2.1 dialect. See MS-SMB 2.2.26.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is needed in order to mark tests as known failures.
metze
|
|
* Ported all tests from raw/notify.c to smb2/notify.c
* Parameterized the max_buffer_size so it can be set on a
per-target basis.
* Fixed CHECK macros to use torture_result
* Created a SMB2-NOTIFY test suite
|
|
The BRL tests previously based their results off several bugs in the
W2K8 byte range lock code. I've fixed up the tests to pass against
Win7 which has fixed these bugs, and assume that the Win7 behavior
is the default.
I have inverted the test behavior for >63-bit lock requests. The
tests previously expected NT_STATUS_OK as their default in this
case. I've changed that default to expect STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE.
This may requires some changing of make test to compensate.
I've also removed a few test scenarios from VALID-REQUEST in preparation
of replacing them with separate tests ported from RAW-LOCK.
|
|
This reduces compile time somewhat.
|
|
In some cases we were not doing streams tests on s4 that we should. In
others, we were calling tests that are known to fail on s4. Some of
those are a bit puzzling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four tests were ported from raw/open.c
One new tests added LEADING-SLASH, which tests that a server provides
the proper error when a relative path is given to a CREATE PDU
with a leading "/".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forgot to "git add" the new file in commit b2bcfaae
|