| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
error on failure
|
|
|
|
|
|
This test opens a directory with delete on close, opens it again,
and checks to make sure that the second open returned with
NT_STATUS_DELETE_PENDING.
|
|
at the moment.
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Jeremy.
|
|
Including new tests for:
- spoolss_SetPrinterDataEx
- spoolss_DeletePrinterDataEx
- spoolss_DeletePrinterKey
Guenther
|
|
deprecated command
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Tim Prouty <tprouty@samba.org>
|
|
Try a rename with a wide-open share mode on an already open file
and the there is still share mode contention. For the reason why
see:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/os_fileservices/thread/3ca14dc9-da1f-4786-a8f7-a86e9903db0c
Msft's anser:
After further review, The reason for server to fail with sharing
violation is that the windows server that executes a path-based
rename request opens the file for DELETE access, but only with
FILE_SHARED_READ as ShareAccess . Therefore, the existing
open(frame 76), which has shared read/write/delete , is compatible
with the Windows servers access mode (DELETE), but Windows servers
open is not compatible with access mode in existing open.
Note that it is correct to state that the logic in Windows server
could have been written to allow shared read/write/delete in which
case it would succeed as you mention. The behavior here is
historical based on the existing implementation.
|
|
|
|
Some servers choose to mark a client as bad if they fail an oplock
break request by timing out (win7 is an example). Once the client is
marked as bad, future oplock requests will timeout instantly. This
causes subsequent runs of this test to fail, so rather than erroring
out as a failure, a warning is printed instead.
There is also a bug in w2k3 where it was incorrectly returning
contending a share mode lock. It worked in XP and has been re-fixed
in win7.
This can also now be run against samba3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
breaks
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
See what happens when we have multiple outstanding lock requests and
we try to cancel both of them within a single LockingAndX.
On Windows, it seems only the first lock in the array is cancelled,
and the second is left pending. Though, this behavior goes against
the MS-CIFS spec.
|
|
* test that 2 locks in a single LockAndX are transactional
* test that 1 unlock and 1 lock in a single LockAndX are not
transactional
* test that SMB2 doesn't like mixed lock/unlock in a single
PDU
|
|
|
|
Abstract the server requirements to pass some BRL tests.
* The new default for >64bit lock tests, is that the server should
return STATUS_INVALID_LOCK_RANGE.
* Add parameter for targets that don't implement DENY_DOS
|
|
Guenther
|
|
This should finally resolve the endian issues we were seeing on sparc and is
much cleaner for spoolss clients and servers.
Guenther
|
|
In light of the INVALID_LEVEL that is seen for RAW_SFILEINFO_END_OF_FILE_INFO
requests on a path, I'm changing these back to using the passthrough
RAW_SFILEINFO_END_OF_FILE_INFORMATION to test the oplock break behavior as
originally intended
|
|
cases
It turns out setting the end-of-file with Trans2SetPathInfo using the
snia spec's info level will attempt to open the file, enforcing share
modes, but then subsequentlys fail the setpathinfo with a dos error of
INVALID_LEVEL. Doing a Trans2SetFileInfo with either end-of-file info
level succeeds as expected.
|
|
This reverts commit 98f595036e196dd61340fef0faf63ca762a25307.
No longer necessary
|
|
Since the windows behavior appears to be a bug, only check for
the windows-style share mode bug if target=<windows variant> is
specified
|
|
in multiple files
|
|
"discard_const_p"s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guenther
|
|
s4 returns NETWORK_NAME_DELETED if you attempt to use an invalid tree connection
for a lock. This test (correctly I think) happens before we validate the file handle.
That implies that when you pass both a closed handle and a invalid tree you
should get NT_STATUS_NETWORK_NAME_DELETED.
|
|
|
|
I think the error/success codes returned by windows for these tests
are quite bogus. The ones s4 gives are much more reasonable. The
locking ones returning NT_STATUS_SUCCESS could lead to data loss, as
an application thinks it has a file locked correctly when it fact it
doesn't, so it could do an unsafe modify.
|
|
I was stumped for a while as to why the drs test suite was failing for
me. It turned out that it looked for LDB_URL in the environment, and
used it if set. I had it set in my terminal, and it was happily
munching on my sam.ldb while testing. Quite a cute bug really :-)
|
|
|
|
Guenther
|
|
Guenther
|
|
RAW-LOCK ported as:
RAW-LOCK-LOCK, RAW-LOCK-LOCKX -> SMB2-LOCK-LOCK
RAW-PIDHIGH -> removed, no longer relevant
RAW-ASYNC -> SMB2-LOCK-ASYNC, SMB2-LOCK-CANCEL, SMB2-LOCK-CANCEL-TDIS, SMB2-LOCK-CANCEL-LOGOFF
RAW-ERRORCODE -> SMB2-LOCK-ERRORCODE
RAW-CHANGETYPE -> removed, no longer relevant
RAW-ZEROBYTELOCKS -> SMB2-LOCK->ZEROBYTELENGTH
RAW-UNLOCK -> SMB2-LOCK-UNLOCK
RAW-MULTIPLE_UNLOCK -> SMB2-LOCK-MULTIPLE-UNLOCK
RAW-STACKING -> SMB2-LOCK-STACKING
BASE-LOCK ported as:
BASE-LOCK-LOCK1 -> SMB2-LOCK-ERRORCODE, timeout is no longer relevant
BASE-LOCK-LOCK2 -> SMB2-LOCK-CONTEND, SMB2-LOCK-LOCK, SMB2-LOCK-CONTEXT
BASE-LOCK-LOCK3 -> SMB2-LOCK-RANGE
BASE-LOCK-LOCK4 -> SMB2-LOCK-OVERLAP
BASE-LOCK-LOCK5 -> SMB2-LOCK-STACKING
BASE-LOCK-LOCK6 -> SMB2-LOCK-CANCEL, change_locktype no longer relevant
BASE-LOCK-LOCK7 -> SMB2-LOCK-RW-SHARED, SMB2-LOCK-RW-EXCLUSIVE
|
