| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
work yet,
but the version before did not either, so we're not worse than before.
One thing this does better is to call the domain init code if it's not there
yet.
Volker
(This used to be commit 35bcfb185b9763a3677d7ac9e748f3a3ba7d2593)
|
|
* rename the composite helper functions from comp_* to composite_*
* Move the lsa initialization to wb_connect_lsa.c
* Equip smb_composite_connect with a fallback_to_anonymous
The latter two simplify wb_init_domain.c quite a bit.
Volker
(This used to be commit deb127e04ea01ae93394da5ebffb39d81caeb6d9)
|
|
Initialize a domain structure properly. Excerpt from wb_init_domain.c:
/*
* Initialize a domain:
*
* - With schannel credentials, try to open the SMB connection with the machine
* creds. Fall back to anonymous.
*
* - If we have schannel creds, do the auth2 and open the schannel'ed netlogon
* pipe.
*
* - Open LSA. If we have machine creds, try to open with ntlmssp. Fall back
* to schannel and then to anon bind.
*
* - With queryinfopolicy, verify that we're talking to the right domain
*
* A bit complex, but with all the combinations I think it's the best we can
* get. NT4, W2k3SP1 and W2k all have different combinations, but in the end we
* have a signed&sealed lsa connection on all of them.
*
* Is this overkill? In particular the authenticated SMB connection seems a
* bit overkill, given that we do schannel for netlogon and ntlmssp for
* lsa later on w2k3, the others don't do this anyway.
*/
Thanks to Jeremy for his detective work, and to the Samba4 team for providing
such a great infrastructure.
Next step is to connect to SAM. Do it via LDAP if we can, fall back to samr
with all we have.
Volker
(This used to be commit 3e69fdc07cd76b4bc01b032148609ee4b59b8be7)
|
|
queryinfopolicy. Idea is to get a consistency check between that and our
notion of the domain name and sid, and take the lsa pipe as the holder of the
central smbcli_tree that netlogon and samr use as well.
Volker
(This used to be commit 126c80aefc4f53c4ba79afc12d70602ef9055ddb)
|
|
domain and gets the DC's name via a mailslot call.
Metze, I renamed wbsrv_queue_reply to wbsrv_send_reply in accordance with
irpc_send_reply. Having _queue_ here and _send_ there is a bit confusing. And
as everything is async anyway, the semantics should not be too much of a
problem.
Volker
(This used to be commit 4637964b19c6e9f7d201b287e2d409d029fced01)
|
|
- remove the echo test stuff
- abstract out the used protocol
- we have a seperate handler for the samba3 protocol now
- the backend can easy do async replies
by setting WBSRV_CALL_FLAGS_REPLY_ASYNC in wbsrv_call
and then call wbsrv_queue_reply() later
metze
(This used to be commit 32f3e68a569e9273b8d34fbd797c0a28494e5b6d)
|
|
- this creates a new task and then starts a process_model "single"
with service "winbind_task"
- that means with -M single everything is in one process
with - M standard winbind is a seperate process but didn't fork for each connection
with -M thread winbind is a seperate thread but didn't thread for each connection
- the dummy server listen s on /tmp/.winbind/echo
and for better testing with telnet also on 127.0.255.1 port 55555
metze
(This used to be commit 5190f60dedc4076d94fbf77e02eb3b5312d953ec)
|
