| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Initialize a domain structure properly. Excerpt from wb_init_domain.c:
/*
* Initialize a domain:
*
* - With schannel credentials, try to open the SMB connection with the machine
* creds. Fall back to anonymous.
*
* - If we have schannel creds, do the auth2 and open the schannel'ed netlogon
* pipe.
*
* - Open LSA. If we have machine creds, try to open with ntlmssp. Fall back
* to schannel and then to anon bind.
*
* - With queryinfopolicy, verify that we're talking to the right domain
*
* A bit complex, but with all the combinations I think it's the best we can
* get. NT4, W2k3SP1 and W2k all have different combinations, but in the end we
* have a signed&sealed lsa connection on all of them.
*
* Is this overkill? In particular the authenticated SMB connection seems a
* bit overkill, given that we do schannel for netlogon and ntlmssp for
* lsa later on w2k3, the others don't do this anyway.
*/
Thanks to Jeremy for his detective work, and to the Samba4 team for providing
such a great infrastructure.
Next step is to connect to SAM. Do it via LDAP if we can, fall back to samr
with all we have.
Volker
(This used to be commit 3e69fdc07cd76b4bc01b032148609ee4b59b8be7)
|
|
of the
async helpers.
Volker
(This used to be commit 10585ba4e81e979a03aec747db6fc059978fa566)
|
|
Abartlet, now I think I need some assistance to implement the pam auth & crap
auth calls.
Volker
(This used to be commit 90a30c8b6585ed48b50e6aed75f3ecfd3543bbdc)
|
|
functions
start to look sane.
Question: What about providing all winbind commands as irpc interfaces that
are called from the samba3 compatibility layer? This way it would be easy for
other samba components to access its functionality. Does that make sense?
Volker
(This used to be commit 2a6b8053859ea5690f90a8d2074d2bb4f06551f8)
|
|
queryinfopolicy. Idea is to get a consistency check between that and our
notion of the domain name and sid, and take the lsa pipe as the holder of the
central smbcli_tree that netlogon and samr use as well.
Volker
(This used to be commit 126c80aefc4f53c4ba79afc12d70602ef9055ddb)
|
|
Tridge, if you have time, you might want to look at the segfault I was still
seeing. Now I store the handle to the netlogon pipe in the global winbind
state and free it on the next entry into check_machacc. The problem seems to
be that talloc_free()ing a pipe struct from within a callback function on that
pipe is not possible. I think I can live with that, but it has been not really
obvious. To reproduce the segfault you might want to look at putting a
talloc_free(state->getcreds->out.netlogon) into
wbsrv_samba3_check_machacc_receive_creds. This is called from a dcerpc
callback function.
In particular if the check failed it would be nice if I could delete the pipe
directly and not post a different event to some winbind queue.
I tried to delete the pipe from a timed event triggered immediately, but this
also fails because the inner loop seems to hit the same event again, calling
it twice.
Volker
(This used to be commit 5436d7764812bb632ba865e633005ed07923b57f)
|
|
domain and gets the DC's name via a mailslot call.
Metze, I renamed wbsrv_queue_reply to wbsrv_send_reply in accordance with
irpc_send_reply. Having _queue_ here and _send_ there is a bit confusing. And
as everything is async anyway, the semantics should not be too much of a
problem.
Volker
(This used to be commit 4637964b19c6e9f7d201b287e2d409d029fced01)
|
|
replies
metze
(This used to be commit cc9579d08567ec38adf0617901669fb3bb91e489)
|
|
- remove the echo test stuff
- abstract out the used protocol
- we have a seperate handler for the samba3 protocol now
- the backend can easy do async replies
by setting WBSRV_CALL_FLAGS_REPLY_ASYNC in wbsrv_call
and then call wbsrv_queue_reply() later
metze
(This used to be commit 32f3e68a569e9273b8d34fbd797c0a28494e5b6d)
|
