From 0fce829de46995d474053bd581555dd40e549ff1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthias Dieter Wallnöfer Date: Mon, 31 May 2010 22:04:29 +0200 Subject: s4:dsdb_load_udv_v1 - "uint32_t" counter type fits better than "unsigned int" --- source4/dsdb/common/util.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source4/dsdb/common/util.c b/source4/dsdb/common/util.c index 9329e61135..408a959276 100644 --- a/source4/dsdb/common/util.c +++ b/source4/dsdb/common/util.c @@ -3310,7 +3310,7 @@ int dsdb_load_udv_v1(struct ldb_context *samdb, struct ldb_dn *dn, TALLOC_CTX *m struct drsuapi_DsReplicaCursor **cursors, uint32_t *count) { struct drsuapi_DsReplicaCursor2 *v2; - unsigned int i; + uint32_t i; int ret; ret = dsdb_load_udv_v2(samdb, dn, mem_ctx, &v2, count); -- cgit