From f1c0c3896edc889f7fda65e27b27aaefc60d46d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 16:26:46 +1000 Subject: Don't use lsa_Delete any more, as smbd now refuses it. (This used to be commit 8e1285a1ee60e3d3b7352ab7269d535c41916b46) --- source4/torture/rpc/session_key.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/session_key.c b/source4/torture/rpc/session_key.c index 0df7e576ee..c069c62724 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/session_key.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/session_key.c @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret_basic(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, struct lsa_SetSecret r3; struct lsa_QuerySecret r4; struct policy_handle sec_handle; - struct lsa_Delete d; + struct lsa_DeleteObject d; struct lsa_DATA_BUF buf1; struct lsa_DATA_BUF_PTR bufp1; DATA_BLOB enc_key; @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ static bool test_CreateSecret_basic(struct dcerpc_pipe *p, torture_assert_str_equal(tctx, secret1, secret2, "Returned secret invalid"); d.in.handle = &sec_handle; - status = dcerpc_lsa_Delete(p, tctx, &d); + d.out.handle = &sec_handle; + status = dcerpc_lsa_DeleteObject(p, tctx, &d); torture_assert_ntstatus_ok(tctx, status, "delete should have returned OKINVALID_HANDLE"); return true; } -- cgit