From 4da8abcf0d48f4e6ec14dc9fecab780e826df4ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 01:23:15 +0000 Subject: r4768: Until I can prove it, we should not have these elements marked as size_is() base arrays. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit 3d3063b1f65efe3b9eb814f7425afa3278095a68) --- source4/librpc/idl/lsa.idl | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/source4/librpc/idl/lsa.idl b/source4/librpc/idl/lsa.idl index 8462c753c5..75d1cadd86 100644 --- a/source4/librpc/idl/lsa.idl +++ b/source4/librpc/idl/lsa.idl @@ -490,11 +490,11 @@ typedef struct { uint32 incoming_count; - [size_is(incoming_count)] lsa_TrustDomainInfoBuffer *incoming_current_auth_info; - [size_is(incoming_count)] lsa_TrustDomainInfoBuffer *incoming_previous_auth_info; + lsa_TrustDomainInfoBuffer *incoming_current_auth_info; + lsa_TrustDomainInfoBuffer *incoming_previous_auth_info; uint32 outgoing_count; - [size_is(outgoing_count)] lsa_TrustDomainInfoBuffer *outgoing_current_auth_info; - [size_is(outgoing_count)] lsa_TrustDomainInfoBuffer *outgoing_previous_auth_info; + lsa_TrustDomainInfoBuffer *outgoing_current_auth_info; + lsa_TrustDomainInfoBuffer *outgoing_previous_auth_info; } lsa_TrustDomainInfoAuthInfo; typedef struct { -- cgit