From 4e7c9367a7f885b685d7d1476c359e5848356f83 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Tridgell Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 03:34:50 +0000 Subject: r18939: don't rely on the umask being right in ldb creation. Both Samba3 and Samba4 smbd force the umask to 0, which meant we ended up with ldb being world writable. This isn't really an ideal fix, as it means ldb no longer honors umask (as it should do, like all good libraries). Unfortunately the 'proper' fix is too complex for now this also merges a tiny code style fix from s4 to s3 (This used to be commit 1a42f38dfdc55d7429a1f8d3e811f3d857195a58) --- source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c b/source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c index 8f676654a6..5d43783903 100644 --- a/source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c +++ b/source4/lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_tdb.c @@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ static int ltdb_connect(struct ldb_context *ldb, const char *url, /* note that we use quite a large default hash size */ ltdb->tdb = ltdb_wrap_open(ltdb, path, 10000, - tdb_flags, open_flags, 0666, ldb); + tdb_flags, open_flags, 0644, ldb); if (!ltdb->tdb) { ldb_debug(ldb, LDB_DEBUG_ERROR, "Unable to open tdb '%s'\n", path); talloc_free(ltdb); -- cgit