From 5c3afaf85621660475baa821537b9dc512d78a4d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 11:58:43 +0000 Subject: r1186: Clarify why this is a 'bogus' negitive test. If we pass it, we may still be broken. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit da5f311732d626c500dc5eaf6d457fee49e2da99) --- source4/torture/rpc/bind.c | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/source4/torture/rpc/bind.c b/source4/torture/rpc/bind.c index 53856cd9b8..477b83031f 100644 --- a/source4/torture/rpc/bind.c +++ b/source4/torture/rpc/bind.c @@ -23,7 +23,15 @@ #include "includes.h" +/* + This test is 'bogus' in that it doesn't actually perform to the + spec. We need to deal with other things inside the DCERPC layer, + before we could have multiple binds. + We should never pass this test, until such details are fixed in our + client, and it looks like multible binds are never used anyway. + +*/ BOOL torture_multi_bind(int dummy) { -- cgit