From ce17f40e0c5ca03e8eaadb55654c07f0377217e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: John Terpstra Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 05:14:15 +0000 Subject: More updates. (This used to be commit bcabb1a1b53e950940ba0c597be9cc861e2a0fa6) --- docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+) (limited to 'docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml') diff --git a/docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml b/docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml index 2c492d4ac0..ae780a4b61 100644 --- a/docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml +++ b/docs/docbook/projdoc/InterdomainTrusts.xml @@ -15,6 +15,25 @@ some background information regarding trust relationships and how to create them possible for Samba-3 to NT4 trust (and vice versa), as well as Samba3 to Samba3 trusts. + +Features and Benefits + + +Samba-3 can participate in Samba-to-Samba as well as in Samba-to-MS Windows NT4 style +trust relationships. This imparts to Samba similar scalability as is possible with +MS Windows NT4. + + + +Given that Samba-3 has the capability to function with a scalable backend authentication +database such as LDAP, and given it's ability to run in Primary as well as Backup Domain control +modes, the administrator would be well advised to consider alternatives to the use of +Interdomain trusts simplt because by the very nature of how this works it is fragile. +That was after all a key reason for the development and adoption of Microsoft Active Directory. + + + + Trust Relationship Background @@ -219,4 +238,15 @@ the secrets.tdb file. + +Common Errors + + +Interdomain trust relationships should NOT be attempted on networks that are unstable +or that suffer regular outages. Network stability and integrity are key concerns with +distributed trusted domains. + + + + -- cgit