From 01f0236f58775e2bf60250caf2b9740bd9f988ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jelmer Vernooij Date: Sun, 30 Mar 2003 11:22:22 +0000 Subject: - Regenerate docs - Document 'preload modules' (This used to be commit 57407401d0f261d4b8e42fdc64479afef10211c3) --- docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html') diff --git a/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html b/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html index d47138d791..8267dda020 100644 --- a/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html +++ b/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html @@ -74,14 +74,14 @@ CLASS="CHAPTER" >Chapter 8. Samba as a NT4 or Win2k domain memberChapter 9. Samba as a NT4 or Win2k domain member

8.1. Joining an NT Domain with Samba 3.09.1. Joining an NT Domain with Samba 3.0

Assume you have a Samba 3.0 server with a NetBIOS name of @@ -268,8 +268,8 @@ CLASS="SECT1" >

8.2. Samba and Windows 2000 Domains9.2. Samba and Windows 2000 Domains

Many people have asked regarding the state of Samba's ability to participate in @@ -282,8 +282,8 @@ CLASS="SECT1" >

8.3. Why is this better than security = server?9.3. Why is this better than security = server?

Currently, domain security in Samba doesn't free you from -- cgit