From 2e2a5d50eb0fcbfdab14e56d6150a1bd35d57f28 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jelmer Vernooij Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:34:49 +0000 Subject: Some more doc updates: - make - update status of docs document - move security_level to 'type of installation' part (This used to be commit 11ad39398e077c3901e63f31bcc6efb223854357) --- docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html | 24 ++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html') diff --git a/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html b/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html index 9cf9eceb8d..1a10767235 100644 --- a/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html +++ b/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html @@ -11,13 +11,13 @@ TITLE="SAMBA Project Documentation" HREF="samba-howto-collection.html">NextChapter 9. Samba as a NT4 domain memberChapter 10. Samba as a NT4 domain member

9.1. Joining an NT Domain with Samba 2.2

10.1. Joining an NT Domain with Samba 2.2

Assume you have a Samba 2.x server with a NetBIOS name of

9.2. Samba and Windows 2000 Domains

10.2. Samba and Windows 2000 Domains

Many people have asked regarding the state of Samba's ability to participate in a Windows 2000 Domain. Samba 3.0 is able to act as a member server of a Windows @@ -336,9 +336,9 @@ CLASS="SECT1" >

9.3. Why is this better than security = server?

10.3. Why is this better than security = server?

Currently, domain security in Samba doesn't free you from having to create local Unix users to represent the users attaching @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ WIDTH="33%" ALIGN="right" VALIGN="top" >NextUp