From f0e282ebf3e459c559bfc08f3e21fdebb2515621 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Gerald Carter Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2003 02:20:27 +0000 Subject: * merge fixes for SGML syntax errors (does no one ever regenerate the docs?) * regenerate the docs * add some files from SAMBA_3_0 (This used to be commit 1af74785f334bd84b2d62e7fc2975f9477386acb) --- docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html | 19 ++++++------------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html') diff --git a/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html b/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html index 1a10767235..670d96ba5f 100644 --- a/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html +++ b/docs/htmldocs/domain-security.html @@ -5,7 +5,8 @@ >Samba as a NT4 domain member

Chapter 10. Samba as a NT4 domain member

Chapter 9. Samba as a NT4 domain member

10.1. Joining an NT Domain with Samba 2.2

9.1. Joining an NT Domain with Samba 2.2

Assume you have a Samba 2.x server with a NetBIOS name of

10.2. Samba and Windows 2000 Domains

9.2. Samba and Windows 2000 Domains

Many people have asked regarding the state of Samba's ability to participate in a Windows 2000 Domain. Samba 3.0 is able to act as a member server of a Windows @@ -336,9 +331,7 @@ CLASS="SECT1" >

10.3. Why is this better than security = server?

9.3. Why is this better than security = server?

Currently, domain security in Samba doesn't free you from having to create local Unix users to represent the users attaching -- cgit