From 3bb3f2d0ce1165d0cac683f507d838d20c8c743b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Allison Date: Sat, 14 Nov 1998 03:01:40 +0000 Subject: Update for 2.0beta1. Jeremy. (This used to be commit 598d0255d40da29ebab3d1a3c9eb66ba654db7b5) --- docs/htmldocs/testprns.1.html | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs/htmldocs/testprns.1.html') diff --git a/docs/htmldocs/testprns.1.html b/docs/htmldocs/testprns.1.html index ef027385f5..62d71a29f2 100644 --- a/docs/htmldocs/testprns.1.html +++ b/docs/htmldocs/testprns.1.html @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ -testparm +testprns (1) @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
-

testparm

+

testprns (1)

Samba

23 Oct 1998

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@


NAME

- testparm - check printer name for validity with smbd + testprns - check printer name for validity with smbd


SYNOPSIS

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ would be wisest to always specify the printcap file to use.
  • printername The printer name to validate.


    Printer names are taken from the first field in each record in the printcap file, single printer names and sets of aliases separated by -vertical bars ("|") are recognised. Note that no validation or +vertical bars ("|") are recognized. Note that no validation or checking of the printcap syntax is done beyond that required to extract the printer name. It may be that the print spooling system is more forgiving or less forgiving than testprns. However, if -- cgit