From bcc51dcc2f47283e5277dbd5b150f081ba35008d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2003 04:44:23 +0000 Subject: Clarify that 'use spnego = yes' is fine in all known situations. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit 0944c69636eb60bc1a4b2a2257dd05f6d385bd4d) --- docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml b/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml index 713d4a012e..b483a97b31 100644 --- a/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml +++ b/docs/docbook/manpages/smb.conf.5.sgml @@ -7332,9 +7332,9 @@ let "time++" This variable controls controls whether samba will try to use Simple and Protected NEGOciation (as specified by rfc2478) with WindowsXP and Windows2000sp2 clients to agree upon an authentication mechanism. - As of samba 3.0alpha it must be set to "no" for these clients to join a samba - domain controller. It can be set to "yes" to allow samba to participate in an - AD domain controlled by a Windows2000 domain controller. + Unless further issues are discovered with our SPNEGO + implementation, there is no reason this should ever be + disabled. Default: use spnego = yes -- cgit