From d281516d0cac8bf2455689b19556282985eac0c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2003 01:25:10 +0000 Subject: Clear up the difference between 'smb signing' and 'sign&seal' - which has to this point referred to schannel. Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit b67479076ddf0c51bc7e319d7fc91a5da52eb8bf) --- docs/docbook/smbdotconf/protocol/clientusespnego.xml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'docs') diff --git a/docs/docbook/smbdotconf/protocol/clientusespnego.xml b/docs/docbook/smbdotconf/protocol/clientusespnego.xml index 7d341abf0f..ce187a36fa 100644 --- a/docs/docbook/smbdotconf/protocol/clientusespnego.xml +++ b/docs/docbook/smbdotconf/protocol/clientusespnego.xml @@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ This variable controls controls whether samba clients will try to use Simple and Protected NEGOciation (as specified by rfc2478) with WindowsXP and Windows2000 servers to agree upon an authentication mechanism. - SPNEGO client support with Sign and Seal is currently broken, so - you might want to turn this option off when doing joins to - Windows 2003 domains. + SPNEGO client support for SMB Signing is currently broken, so + you might want to turn this option off when operating with + Windows 2003 domain controllers in particular. Default: client use spnego = yes -- cgit