From 754c677b0bbf3ea6c7d2a73c93848f1b0d68c91e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rusty Russell Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:54:15 +0930 Subject: lib: import ccan modules for tdb2 Imported from git://git.ozlabs.org/~ccan/ccan init-1161-g661d41f Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell --- lib/ccan/hash/hash.c | 925 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 925 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/ccan/hash/hash.c (limited to 'lib/ccan/hash/hash.c') diff --git a/lib/ccan/hash/hash.c b/lib/ccan/hash/hash.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0fd6109513 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/ccan/hash/hash.c @@ -0,0 +1,925 @@ +/* +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +lookup3.c, by Bob Jenkins, May 2006, Public Domain. + +These are functions for producing 32-bit hashes for hash table lookup. +hash_word(), hashlittle(), hashlittle2(), hashbig(), mix(), and final() +are externally useful functions. Routines to test the hash are included +if SELF_TEST is defined. You can use this free for any purpose. It's in +the public domain. It has no warranty. + +You probably want to use hashlittle(). hashlittle() and hashbig() +hash byte arrays. hashlittle() is is faster than hashbig() on +little-endian machines. Intel and AMD are little-endian machines. +On second thought, you probably want hashlittle2(), which is identical to +hashlittle() except it returns two 32-bit hashes for the price of one. +You could implement hashbig2() if you wanted but I haven't bothered here. + +If you want to find a hash of, say, exactly 7 integers, do + a = i1; b = i2; c = i3; + mix(a,b,c); + a += i4; b += i5; c += i6; + mix(a,b,c); + a += i7; + final(a,b,c); +then use c as the hash value. If you have a variable length array of +4-byte integers to hash, use hash_word(). If you have a byte array (like +a character string), use hashlittle(). If you have several byte arrays, or +a mix of things, see the comments above hashlittle(). + +Why is this so big? I read 12 bytes at a time into 3 4-byte integers, +then mix those integers. This is fast (you can do a lot more thorough +mixing with 12*3 instructions on 3 integers than you can with 3 instructions +on 1 byte), but shoehorning those bytes into integers efficiently is messy. +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ +//#define SELF_TEST 1 + +#if 0 +#include /* defines printf for tests */ +#include /* defines time_t for timings in the test */ +#include /* defines uint32_t etc */ +#include /* attempt to define endianness */ + +#ifdef linux +# include /* attempt to define endianness */ +#endif + +/* + * My best guess at if you are big-endian or little-endian. This may + * need adjustment. + */ +#if (defined(__BYTE_ORDER) && defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN) && \ + __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN) || \ + (defined(i386) || defined(__i386__) || defined(__i486__) || \ + defined(__i586__) || defined(__i686__) || defined(__x86_64) || \ + defined(vax) || defined(MIPSEL)) +# define HASH_LITTLE_ENDIAN 1 +# define HASH_BIG_ENDIAN 0 +#elif (defined(__BYTE_ORDER) && defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) && \ + __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN) || \ + (defined(sparc) || defined(POWERPC) || defined(mc68000) || defined(sel)) +# define HASH_LITTLE_ENDIAN 0 +# define HASH_BIG_ENDIAN 1 +#else +# error Unknown endian +#endif +#endif /* old hash.c headers. */ + +#include "hash.h" + +#if HAVE_LITTLE_ENDIAN +#define HASH_LITTLE_ENDIAN 1 +#define HASH_BIG_ENDIAN 0 +#elif HAVE_BIG_ENDIAN +#define HASH_LITTLE_ENDIAN 0 +#define HASH_BIG_ENDIAN 1 +#else +#error Unknown endian +#endif + +#define hashsize(n) ((uint32_t)1<<(n)) +#define hashmask(n) (hashsize(n)-1) +#define rot(x,k) (((x)<<(k)) | ((x)>>(32-(k)))) + +/* +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +mix -- mix 3 32-bit values reversibly. + +This is reversible, so any information in (a,b,c) before mix() is +still in (a,b,c) after mix(). + +If four pairs of (a,b,c) inputs are run through mix(), or through +mix() in reverse, there are at least 32 bits of the output that +are sometimes the same for one pair and different for another pair. +This was tested for: +* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination + of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of + (a,b,c). +* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed + the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as + is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit + difference. +* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or + all zero plus a counter that starts at zero. + +Some k values for my "a-=c; a^=rot(c,k); c+=b;" arrangement that +satisfy this are + 4 6 8 16 19 4 + 9 15 3 18 27 15 + 14 9 3 7 17 3 +Well, "9 15 3 18 27 15" didn't quite get 32 bits diffing +for "differ" defined as + with a one-bit base and a two-bit delta. I +used http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/avalanche.html to choose +the operations, constants, and arrangements of the variables. + +This does not achieve avalanche. There are input bits of (a,b,c) +that fail to affect some output bits of (a,b,c), especially of a. The +most thoroughly mixed value is c, but it doesn't really even achieve +avalanche in c. + +This allows some parallelism. Read-after-writes are good at doubling +the number of bits affected, so the goal of mixing pulls in the opposite +direction as the goal of parallelism. I did what I could. Rotates +seem to cost as much as shifts on every machine I could lay my hands +on, and rotates are much kinder to the top and bottom bits, so I used +rotates. +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ +#define mix(a,b,c) \ +{ \ + a -= c; a ^= rot(c, 4); c += b; \ + b -= a; b ^= rot(a, 6); a += c; \ + c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 8); b += a; \ + a -= c; a ^= rot(c,16); c += b; \ + b -= a; b ^= rot(a,19); a += c; \ + c -= b; c ^= rot(b, 4); b += a; \ +} + +/* +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +final -- final mixing of 3 32-bit values (a,b,c) into c + +Pairs of (a,b,c) values differing in only a few bits will usually +produce values of c that look totally different. This was tested for +* pairs that differed by one bit, by two bits, in any combination + of top bits of (a,b,c), or in any combination of bottom bits of + (a,b,c). +* "differ" is defined as +, -, ^, or ~^. For + and -, I transformed + the output delta to a Gray code (a^(a>>1)) so a string of 1's (as + is commonly produced by subtraction) look like a single 1-bit + difference. +* the base values were pseudorandom, all zero but one bit set, or + all zero plus a counter that starts at zero. + +These constants passed: + 14 11 25 16 4 14 24 + 12 14 25 16 4 14 24 +and these came close: + 4 8 15 26 3 22 24 + 10 8 15 26 3 22 24 + 11 8 15 26 3 22 24 +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ +#define final(a,b,c) \ +{ \ + c ^= b; c -= rot(b,14); \ + a ^= c; a -= rot(c,11); \ + b ^= a; b -= rot(a,25); \ + c ^= b; c -= rot(b,16); \ + a ^= c; a -= rot(c,4); \ + b ^= a; b -= rot(a,14); \ + c ^= b; c -= rot(b,24); \ +} + +/* +-------------------------------------------------------------------- + This works on all machines. To be useful, it requires + -- that the key be an array of uint32_t's, and + -- that the length be the number of uint32_t's in the key + + The function hash_word() is identical to hashlittle() on little-endian + machines, and identical to hashbig() on big-endian machines, + except that the length has to be measured in uint32_ts rather than in + bytes. hashlittle() is more complicated than hash_word() only because + hashlittle() has to dance around fitting the key bytes into registers. +-------------------------------------------------------------------- +*/ +uint32_t hash_u32( +const uint32_t *k, /* the key, an array of uint32_t values */ +size_t length, /* the length of the key, in uint32_ts */ +uint32_t initval) /* the previous hash, or an arbitrary value */ +{ + uint32_t a,b,c; + + /* Set up the internal state */ + a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + (((uint32_t)length)<<2) + initval; + + /*------------------------------------------------- handle most of the key */ + while (length > 3) + { + a += k[0]; + b += k[1]; + c += k[2]; + mix(a,b,c); + length -= 3; + k += 3; + } + + /*------------------------------------------- handle the last 3 uint32_t's */ + switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */ + { + case 3 : c+=k[2]; + case 2 : b+=k[1]; + case 1 : a+=k[0]; + final(a,b,c); + case 0: /* case 0: nothing left to add */ + break; + } + /*------------------------------------------------------ report the result */ + return c; +} + +/* +------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +hashlittle() -- hash a variable-length key into a 32-bit value + k : the key (the unaligned variable-length array of bytes) + length : the length of the key, counting by bytes + val2 : IN: can be any 4-byte value OUT: second 32 bit hash. +Returns a 32-bit value. Every bit of the key affects every bit of +the return value. Two keys differing by one or two bits will have +totally different hash values. Note that the return value is better +mixed than val2, so use that first. + +The best hash table sizes are powers of 2. There is no need to do +mod a prime (mod is sooo slow!). If you need less than 32 bits, +use a bitmask. For example, if you need only 10 bits, do + h = (h & hashmask(10)); +In which case, the hash table should have hashsize(10) elements. + +If you are hashing n strings (uint8_t **)k, do it like this: + for (i=0, h=0; i 12) + { + a += k[0]; + b += k[1]; + c += k[2]; + mix(a,b,c); + length -= 12; + k += 3; + } + + /*----------------------------- handle the last (probably partial) block */ + /* + * "k[2]&0xffffff" actually reads beyond the end of the string, but + * then masks off the part it's not allowed to read. Because the + * string is aligned, the masked-off tail is in the same word as the + * rest of the string. Every machine with memory protection I've seen + * does it on word boundaries, so is OK with this. But VALGRIND will + * still catch it and complain. The masking trick does make the hash + * noticably faster for short strings (like English words). + * + * Not on my testing with gcc 4.5 on an intel i5 CPU, at least --RR. + */ +#if 0 + switch(length) + { + case 12: c+=k[2]; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 11: c+=k[2]&0xffffff; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 10: c+=k[2]&0xffff; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 9 : c+=k[2]&0xff; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 8 : b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 7 : b+=k[1]&0xffffff; a+=k[0]; break; + case 6 : b+=k[1]&0xffff; a+=k[0]; break; + case 5 : b+=k[1]&0xff; a+=k[0]; break; + case 4 : a+=k[0]; break; + case 3 : a+=k[0]&0xffffff; break; + case 2 : a+=k[0]&0xffff; break; + case 1 : a+=k[0]&0xff; break; + case 0 : return c; /* zero length strings require no mixing */ + } + +#else /* make valgrind happy */ + + k8 = (const uint8_t *)k; + switch(length) + { + case 12: c+=k[2]; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 11: c+=((uint32_t)k8[10])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 10: c+=((uint32_t)k8[9])<<8; /* fall through */ + case 9 : c+=k8[8]; /* fall through */ + case 8 : b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 7 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[6])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 6 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[5])<<8; /* fall through */ + case 5 : b+=k8[4]; /* fall through */ + case 4 : a+=k[0]; break; + case 3 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[2])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 2 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[1])<<8; /* fall through */ + case 1 : a+=k8[0]; break; + case 0 : return c; + } + +#endif /* !valgrind */ + + } else if (HASH_LITTLE_ENDIAN && ((u.i & 0x1) == 0)) { + const uint16_t *k = (const uint16_t *)key; /* read 16-bit chunks */ + const uint8_t *k8; + + /*--------------- all but last block: aligned reads and different mixing */ + while (length > 12) + { + a += k[0] + (((uint32_t)k[1])<<16); + b += k[2] + (((uint32_t)k[3])<<16); + c += k[4] + (((uint32_t)k[5])<<16); + mix(a,b,c); + length -= 12; + k += 6; + } + + /*----------------------------- handle the last (probably partial) block */ + k8 = (const uint8_t *)k; + switch(length) + { + case 12: c+=k[4]+(((uint32_t)k[5])<<16); + b+=k[2]+(((uint32_t)k[3])<<16); + a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16); + break; + case 11: c+=((uint32_t)k8[10])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 10: c+=k[4]; + b+=k[2]+(((uint32_t)k[3])<<16); + a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16); + break; + case 9 : c+=k8[8]; /* fall through */ + case 8 : b+=k[2]+(((uint32_t)k[3])<<16); + a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16); + break; + case 7 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[6])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 6 : b+=k[2]; + a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16); + break; + case 5 : b+=k8[4]; /* fall through */ + case 4 : a+=k[0]+(((uint32_t)k[1])<<16); + break; + case 3 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[2])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 2 : a+=k[0]; + break; + case 1 : a+=k8[0]; + break; + case 0 : return c; /* zero length requires no mixing */ + } + + } else { /* need to read the key one byte at a time */ + const uint8_t *k = (const uint8_t *)key; + + /*--------------- all but the last block: affect some 32 bits of (a,b,c) */ + while (length > 12) + { + a += k[0]; + a += ((uint32_t)k[1])<<8; + a += ((uint32_t)k[2])<<16; + a += ((uint32_t)k[3])<<24; + b += k[4]; + b += ((uint32_t)k[5])<<8; + b += ((uint32_t)k[6])<<16; + b += ((uint32_t)k[7])<<24; + c += k[8]; + c += ((uint32_t)k[9])<<8; + c += ((uint32_t)k[10])<<16; + c += ((uint32_t)k[11])<<24; + mix(a,b,c); + length -= 12; + k += 12; + } + + /*-------------------------------- last block: affect all 32 bits of (c) */ + switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */ + { + case 12: c+=((uint32_t)k[11])<<24; + case 11: c+=((uint32_t)k[10])<<16; + case 10: c+=((uint32_t)k[9])<<8; + case 9 : c+=k[8]; + case 8 : b+=((uint32_t)k[7])<<24; + case 7 : b+=((uint32_t)k[6])<<16; + case 6 : b+=((uint32_t)k[5])<<8; + case 5 : b+=k[4]; + case 4 : a+=((uint32_t)k[3])<<24; + case 3 : a+=((uint32_t)k[2])<<16; + case 2 : a+=((uint32_t)k[1])<<8; + case 1 : a+=k[0]; + break; + case 0 : return c; + } + } + + final(a,b,c); + *val2 = b; + return c; +} + +/* + * hashbig(): + * This is the same as hash_word() on big-endian machines. It is different + * from hashlittle() on all machines. hashbig() takes advantage of + * big-endian byte ordering. + */ +static uint32_t hashbig( const void *key, size_t length, uint32_t *val2) +{ + uint32_t a,b,c; + union { const void *ptr; size_t i; } u; /* to cast key to (size_t) happily */ + + /* Set up the internal state */ + a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + ((uint32_t)length) + *val2; + + u.ptr = key; + if (HASH_BIG_ENDIAN && ((u.i & 0x3) == 0)) { + const uint32_t *k = (const uint32_t *)key; /* read 32-bit chunks */ + const uint8_t *k8; + + /*------ all but last block: aligned reads and affect 32 bits of (a,b,c) */ + while (length > 12) + { + a += k[0]; + b += k[1]; + c += k[2]; + mix(a,b,c); + length -= 12; + k += 3; + } + + /*----------------------------- handle the last (probably partial) block */ + /* + * "k[2]<<8" actually reads beyond the end of the string, but + * then shifts out the part it's not allowed to read. Because the + * string is aligned, the illegal read is in the same word as the + * rest of the string. Every machine with memory protection I've seen + * does it on word boundaries, so is OK with this. But VALGRIND will + * still catch it and complain. The masking trick does make the hash + * noticably faster for short strings (like English words). + * + * Not on my testing with gcc 4.5 on an intel i5 CPU, at least --RR. + */ +#if 0 + switch(length) + { + case 12: c+=k[2]; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 11: c+=k[2]&0xffffff00; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 10: c+=k[2]&0xffff0000; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 9 : c+=k[2]&0xff000000; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 8 : b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 7 : b+=k[1]&0xffffff00; a+=k[0]; break; + case 6 : b+=k[1]&0xffff0000; a+=k[0]; break; + case 5 : b+=k[1]&0xff000000; a+=k[0]; break; + case 4 : a+=k[0]; break; + case 3 : a+=k[0]&0xffffff00; break; + case 2 : a+=k[0]&0xffff0000; break; + case 1 : a+=k[0]&0xff000000; break; + case 0 : return c; /* zero length strings require no mixing */ + } + +#else /* make valgrind happy */ + + k8 = (const uint8_t *)k; + switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */ + { + case 12: c+=k[2]; b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 11: c+=((uint32_t)k8[10])<<8; /* fall through */ + case 10: c+=((uint32_t)k8[9])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 9 : c+=((uint32_t)k8[8])<<24; /* fall through */ + case 8 : b+=k[1]; a+=k[0]; break; + case 7 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[6])<<8; /* fall through */ + case 6 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[5])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 5 : b+=((uint32_t)k8[4])<<24; /* fall through */ + case 4 : a+=k[0]; break; + case 3 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[2])<<8; /* fall through */ + case 2 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[1])<<16; /* fall through */ + case 1 : a+=((uint32_t)k8[0])<<24; break; + case 0 : return c; + } + +#endif /* !VALGRIND */ + + } else { /* need to read the key one byte at a time */ + const uint8_t *k = (const uint8_t *)key; + + /*--------------- all but the last block: affect some 32 bits of (a,b,c) */ + while (length > 12) + { + a += ((uint32_t)k[0])<<24; + a += ((uint32_t)k[1])<<16; + a += ((uint32_t)k[2])<<8; + a += ((uint32_t)k[3]); + b += ((uint32_t)k[4])<<24; + b += ((uint32_t)k[5])<<16; + b += ((uint32_t)k[6])<<8; + b += ((uint32_t)k[7]); + c += ((uint32_t)k[8])<<24; + c += ((uint32_t)k[9])<<16; + c += ((uint32_t)k[10])<<8; + c += ((uint32_t)k[11]); + mix(a,b,c); + length -= 12; + k += 12; + } + + /*-------------------------------- last block: affect all 32 bits of (c) */ + switch(length) /* all the case statements fall through */ + { + case 12: c+=k[11]; + case 11: c+=((uint32_t)k[10])<<8; + case 10: c+=((uint32_t)k[9])<<16; + case 9 : c+=((uint32_t)k[8])<<24; + case 8 : b+=k[7]; + case 7 : b+=((uint32_t)k[6])<<8; + case 6 : b+=((uint32_t)k[5])<<16; + case 5 : b+=((uint32_t)k[4])<<24; + case 4 : a+=k[3]; + case 3 : a+=((uint32_t)k[2])<<8; + case 2 : a+=((uint32_t)k[1])<<16; + case 1 : a+=((uint32_t)k[0])<<24; + break; + case 0 : return c; + } + } + + final(a,b,c); + *val2 = b; + return c; +} + +/* I basically use hashlittle here, but use native endian within each + * element. This delivers least-surprise: hash such as "int arr[] = { + * 1, 2 }; hash_stable(arr, 2, 0);" will be the same on big and little + * endian machines, even though a bytewise hash wouldn't be. */ +uint64_t hash64_stable_64(const void *key, size_t n, uint64_t base) +{ + const uint64_t *k = key; + uint32_t a,b,c; + + /* Set up the internal state */ + a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + ((uint32_t)n*8) + (base >> 32) + base; + + while (n > 3) { + a += (uint32_t)k[0]; + b += (uint32_t)(k[0] >> 32); + c += (uint32_t)k[1]; + mix(a,b,c); + a += (uint32_t)(k[1] >> 32); + b += (uint32_t)k[2]; + c += (uint32_t)(k[2] >> 32); + mix(a,b,c); + n -= 3; + k += 3; + } + switch (n) { + case 2: + a += (uint32_t)k[0]; + b += (uint32_t)(k[0] >> 32); + c += (uint32_t)k[1]; + mix(a,b,c); + a += (uint32_t)(k[1] >> 32); + break; + case 1: + a += (uint32_t)k[0]; + b += (uint32_t)(k[0] >> 32); + break; + case 0: + return c; + } + final(a,b,c); + return ((uint64_t)b << 32) | c; +} + +uint64_t hash64_stable_32(const void *key, size_t n, uint64_t base) +{ + const uint32_t *k = key; + uint32_t a,b,c; + + /* Set up the internal state */ + a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + ((uint32_t)n*4) + (base >> 32) + base; + + while (n > 3) { + a += k[0]; + b += k[1]; + c += k[2]; + mix(a,b,c); + + n -= 3; + k += 3; + } + switch (n) { + case 2: + b += (uint32_t)k[1]; + case 1: + a += (uint32_t)k[0]; + break; + case 0: + return c; + } + final(a,b,c); + return ((uint64_t)b << 32) | c; +} + +uint64_t hash64_stable_16(const void *key, size_t n, uint64_t base) +{ + const uint16_t *k = key; + uint32_t a,b,c; + + /* Set up the internal state */ + a = b = c = 0xdeadbeef + ((uint32_t)n*2) + (base >> 32) + base; + + while (n > 6) { + a += (uint32_t)k[0] + ((uint32_t)k[1] << 16); + b += (uint32_t)k[2] + ((uint32_t)k[3] << 16); + c += (uint32_t)k[4] + ((uint32_t)k[5] << 16); + mix(a,b,c); + + n -= 6; + k += 6; + } + + switch (n) { + case 5: + c += (uint32_t)k[4]; + case 4: + b += ((uint32_t)k[3] << 16); + case 3: + b += (uint32_t)k[2]; + case 2: + a += ((uint32_t)k[1] << 16); + case 1: + a += (uint32_t)k[0]; + break; + case 0: + return c; + } + final(a,b,c); + return ((uint64_t)b << 32) | c; +} + +uint64_t hash64_stable_8(const void *key, size_t n, uint64_t base) +{ + uint32_t b32 = base + (base >> 32); + uint32_t lower = hashlittle(key, n, &b32); + + return ((uint64_t)b32 << 32) | lower; +} + +uint32_t hash_any(const void *key, size_t length, uint32_t base) +{ + if (HASH_BIG_ENDIAN) + return hashbig(key, length, &base); + else + return hashlittle(key, length, &base); +} + +uint32_t hash_stable_64(const void *key, size_t n, uint32_t base) +{ + return hash64_stable_64(key, n, base); +} + +uint32_t hash_stable_32(const void *key, size_t n, uint32_t base) +{ + return hash64_stable_32(key, n, base); +} + +uint32_t hash_stable_16(const void *key, size_t n, uint32_t base) +{ + return hash64_stable_16(key, n, base); +} + +uint32_t hash_stable_8(const void *key, size_t n, uint32_t base) +{ + return hashlittle(key, n, &base); +} + +/* Jenkins' lookup8 is a 64 bit hash, but he says it's obsolete. Use + * the plain one and recombine into 64 bits. */ +uint64_t hash64_any(const void *key, size_t length, uint64_t base) +{ + uint32_t b32 = base + (base >> 32); + uint32_t lower; + + if (HASH_BIG_ENDIAN) + lower = hashbig(key, length, &b32); + else + lower = hashlittle(key, length, &b32); + + return ((uint64_t)b32 << 32) | lower; +} + +#ifdef SELF_TEST + +/* used for timings */ +void driver1() +{ + uint8_t buf[256]; + uint32_t i; + uint32_t h=0; + time_t a,z; + + time(&a); + for (i=0; i<256; ++i) buf[i] = 'x'; + for (i=0; i<1; ++i) + { + h = hashlittle(&buf[0],1,h); + } + time(&z); + if (z-a > 0) printf("time %d %.8x\n", z-a, h); +} + +/* check that every input bit changes every output bit half the time */ +#define HASHSTATE 1 +#define HASHLEN 1 +#define MAXPAIR 60 +#define MAXLEN 70 +void driver2() +{ + uint8_t qa[MAXLEN+1], qb[MAXLEN+2], *a = &qa[0], *b = &qb[1]; + uint32_t c[HASHSTATE], d[HASHSTATE], i=0, j=0, k, l, m=0, z; + uint32_t e[HASHSTATE],f[HASHSTATE],g[HASHSTATE],h[HASHSTATE]; + uint32_t x[HASHSTATE],y[HASHSTATE]; + uint32_t hlen; + + printf("No more than %d trials should ever be needed \n",MAXPAIR/2); + for (hlen=0; hlen < MAXLEN; ++hlen) + { + z=0; + for (i=0; i>(8-j)); + c[0] = hashlittle(a, hlen, m); + b[i] ^= ((k+1)<>(8-j)); + d[0] = hashlittle(b, hlen, m); + /* check every bit is 1, 0, set, and not set at least once */ + for (l=0; lz) z=k; + if (k==MAXPAIR) + { + printf("Some bit didn't change: "); + printf("%.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x ", + e[0],f[0],g[0],h[0],x[0],y[0]); + printf("i %d j %d m %d len %d\n", i, j, m, hlen); + } + if (z==MAXPAIR) goto done; + } + } + } + done: + if (z < MAXPAIR) + { + printf("Mix success %2d bytes %2d initvals ",i,m); + printf("required %d trials\n", z/2); + } + } + printf("\n"); +} + +/* Check for reading beyond the end of the buffer and alignment problems */ +void driver3() +{ + uint8_t buf[MAXLEN+20], *b; + uint32_t len; + uint8_t q[] = "This is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country..."; + uint32_t h; + uint8_t qq[] = "xThis is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country..."; + uint32_t i; + uint8_t qqq[] = "xxThis is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country..."; + uint32_t j; + uint8_t qqqq[] = "xxxThis is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country..."; + uint32_t ref,x,y; + uint8_t *p; + + printf("Endianness. These lines should all be the same (for values filled in):\n"); + printf("%.8x %.8x %.8x\n", + hash_word((const uint32_t *)q, (sizeof(q)-1)/4, 13), + hash_word((const uint32_t *)q, (sizeof(q)-5)/4, 13), + hash_word((const uint32_t *)q, (sizeof(q)-9)/4, 13)); + p = q; + printf("%.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x\n", + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-1, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-2, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-3, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-4, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-5, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-6, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-7, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-8, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-9, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-10, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-11, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-12, 13)); + p = &qq[1]; + printf("%.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x\n", + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-1, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-2, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-3, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-4, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-5, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-6, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-7, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-8, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-9, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-10, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-11, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-12, 13)); + p = &qqq[2]; + printf("%.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x\n", + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-1, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-2, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-3, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-4, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-5, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-6, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-7, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-8, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-9, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-10, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-11, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-12, 13)); + p = &qqqq[3]; + printf("%.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x %.8x\n", + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-1, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-2, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-3, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-4, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-5, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-6, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-7, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-8, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-9, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-10, 13), + hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-11, 13), hashlittle(p, sizeof(q)-12, 13)); + printf("\n"); + + /* check that hashlittle2 and hashlittle produce the same results */ + i=47; j=0; + hashlittle2(q, sizeof(q), &i, &j); + if (hashlittle(q, sizeof(q), 47) != i) + printf("hashlittle2 and hashlittle mismatch\n"); + + /* check that hash_word2 and hash_word produce the same results */ + len = 0xdeadbeef; + i=47, j=0; + hash_word2(&len, 1, &i, &j); + if (hash_word(&len, 1, 47) != i) + printf("hash_word2 and hash_word mismatch %x %x\n", + i, hash_word(&len, 1, 47)); + + /* check hashlittle doesn't read before or after the ends of the string */ + for (h=0, b=buf+1; h<8; ++h, ++b) + { + for (i=0; i