From b5b9c46c0fa3a98999f5afbda497e88a6d319151 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tim Potter Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 07:43:50 +0000 Subject: Don't overwrite an existing /etc/xinetd.d/swat on install file since we don't overwrite it on upgrade. Does this make sense? (This used to be commit 90b3dccfd421bac6516c298f85fcccc857c57989) --- packaging/RedHat/samba2.spec.tmpl | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'packaging/RedHat/samba2.spec.tmpl') diff --git a/packaging/RedHat/samba2.spec.tmpl b/packaging/RedHat/samba2.spec.tmpl index 73c2a3e985..c99b912382 100644 --- a/packaging/RedHat/samba2.spec.tmpl +++ b/packaging/RedHat/samba2.spec.tmpl @@ -308,8 +308,8 @@ if [ -f /etc/inetd.conf ]; then fi # Add swat entry to xinetd.d if needed. -if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/xinetd.d ]; then - mv /etc/samba/samba.xinetd /etc/xinetd.d/swat +if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/xinetd.d -a ! -f /etc/xinetd.d/swat ]; then + mv /etc/samba/samba.xinetd /etc/xinetd.d/swat else rm -f /etc/samba/samba.xinetd fi -- cgit