From f490794c514d8f33f0affefc59460b18c63c1c60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Metzmacher Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2006 23:27:04 +0000 Subject: r18699: bail out if the compiler doesn't know about C99 struct initializers as we currently have them in the samba3 tree. Lets see what the build-farm says to this. metze (This used to be commit 12a0daa34d51b34a469f7d64f370069b73c0aba9) --- source3/configure.in | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'source3/configure.in') diff --git a/source3/configure.in b/source3/configure.in index 918bcada22..4068f54e4c 100644 --- a/source3/configure.in +++ b/source3/configure.in @@ -536,7 +536,7 @@ fi dnl Figure out the flags to support named structure initializers -LIBREPLACE_C99_STRUCT_INIT([],[AC_MSG_WARN([c99 structure initializer are not supported])]) +LIBREPLACE_C99_STRUCT_INIT([],[AC_MSG_ERROR([c99 structure initializer are not supported])]) UNAME_S=`(uname -s) 2>/dev/null` || UNAME_S="unknown" AC_MSG_CHECKING(uname -s) -- cgit