From 1ebfc66b2c145289d1e1314e8415d9e3c6f405ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Volker Lendecke <vl@samba.org>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 21:08:29 +0100
Subject: Use a separate tdb for mutexes

Another preparation to convert secrets.c to dbwrap: The dbwrap API does not
provide a sane tdb_lock_with_timeout abstraction. In the clustered case the DC
mutex is needed per-node anyway, so it is perfectly fine to use a local mutex
only.
(This used to be commit f94a63cd8f94490780ad9331da229c0bcb2ca5d6)
---
 source3/include/smb.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

(limited to 'source3/include/smb.h')

diff --git a/source3/include/smb.h b/source3/include/smb.h
index c582a97e5c..bf9ca6b92c 100644
--- a/source3/include/smb.h
+++ b/source3/include/smb.h
@@ -420,6 +420,7 @@ struct timed_event;
 struct idle_event;
 struct share_mode_entry;
 struct uuid;
+struct named_mutex;
 
 struct vfs_fsp_data {
     struct vfs_fsp_data *next;
-- 
cgit