From e9ea36e4d2270bd7d32da12ef6d6e2299641582d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Tridgell Date: Sat, 5 Sep 1998 05:07:05 +0000 Subject: tridge the destroyer returns! prompted by the interpret_security() dead code that Jean-Francois pointed out I added a make target "finddead" that finds potentially dead (ie. unused) code. It spat out 304 function names ... I went through these are deleted many of them, making others static (finddead also reports functions that are used only in the local file). in doing this I have almost certainly deleted some useful code. I may have even prevented compilation with some compile options. I apologise. I decided it was better to get rid of this code now and add back the one or two functions that are needed than to keep all this baggage. So, if I have done a bit too much "destroying" then let me know. Keep the swearing to a minimum :) One bit I didn't do is the ubibt code. Chris, can you look at that? Heaps of unused functions there. Can they be made static? (This used to be commit 2204475c87f3024ea8fd1fbd7385b2def617a46f) --- source3/lib/bitmap.c | 11 ----------- 1 file changed, 11 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/lib/bitmap.c') diff --git a/source3/lib/bitmap.c b/source3/lib/bitmap.c index ce677f7846..9ccdbb420b 100644 --- a/source3/lib/bitmap.c +++ b/source3/lib/bitmap.c @@ -50,17 +50,6 @@ struct bitmap *bitmap_allocate(int n) return bm; } -/**************************************************************************** -free a bitmap structure -****************************************************************************/ -void bitmap_free(struct bitmap *bm) -{ - free(bm->b); - bm->b = NULL; - free(bm); -} - - /**************************************************************************** set a bit in a bitmap ****************************************************************************/ -- cgit