From 89c95454300f28b0241a44fc2aa7886304c90824 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jelmer Vernooij <jelmer@samba.org>
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 15:56:07 +0200
Subject: Use str_list_equal() rather than str_list_compare().

---
 source3/lib/util_str.c | 23 -----------------------
 1 file changed, 23 deletions(-)

(limited to 'source3/lib')

diff --git a/source3/lib/util_str.c b/source3/lib/util_str.c
index 5d1893a85b..80aaa2b9c0 100644
--- a/source3/lib/util_str.c
+++ b/source3/lib/util_str.c
@@ -1843,29 +1843,6 @@ int fstr_sprintf(fstring s, const char *fmt, ...)
 
 #define S_LIST_ABS 16 /* List Allocation Block Size */
 
-/**
- * Return true if all the elements of the list match exactly.
- **/
-bool str_list_compare(char **list1, char **list2)
-{
-	int num;
-
-	if (!list1 || !list2)
-		return (list1 == list2);
-
-	for (num = 0; list1[num]; num++) {
-		if (!list2[num])
-			return false;
-		if (!strcsequal(list1[num], list2[num]))
-			return false;
-	}
-	if (list2[num])
-		return false; /* if list2 has more elements than list1 fail */
-
-	return true;
-}
-
-
 /******************************************************************************
  version of standard_sub_basic() for string lists; uses talloc_sub_basic()
  for the work
-- 
cgit