From b00529585d0a1d364be766e16779e5ff4ae5c43d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Günther Deschner Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 13:45:38 +0100 Subject: Merge over security.idl from samba4. Guenther (This used to be commit 57f2b8d0a8d8987a62419e9852ac9a9cf39c3109) --- source3/librpc/idl/security.idl | 21 +++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/librpc/idl/security.idl') diff --git a/source3/librpc/idl/security.idl b/source3/librpc/idl/security.idl index 929c6cc18a..753fad85cf 100644 --- a/source3/librpc/idl/security.idl +++ b/source3/librpc/idl/security.idl @@ -4,9 +4,26 @@ security IDL structures */ +import "misc.idl"; + +/* + use the same structure for dom_sid2 as dom_sid. A dom_sid2 is really + just a dom sid, but with the sub_auths represented as a conformant + array. As with all in-structure conformant arrays, the array length + is placed before the start of the structure. That's what gives rise + to the extra num_auths elemenent. We don't want the Samba code to + have to bother with such esoteric NDR details, so its easier to just + define it as a dom_sid and use pidl magic to make it all work. It + just means you need to mark a sid as a "dom_sid2" in the IDL when you + know it is of the conformant array variety +*/ +cpp_quote("#define dom_sid2 dom_sid") + +/* same struct as dom_sid but inside a 28 bytes fixed buffer in NDR */ +cpp_quote("#define dom_sid28 dom_sid") + [ - pointer_default(unique), - depends(misc,security) + pointer_default(unique) ] interface security { -- cgit