From 00b2cdf75e9bea25034440054b4acd91a179c86d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Allison Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 18:09:07 -0700 Subject: Yay ! Remove a VFS entry. Removed the set_nt_acl() call, this can only be done via fset_nt_acl() using an open file/directory handle. I'd like to do the same with get_nt_acl() but am concerned about efficiency problems with "hide unreadable/hide unwritable" when doing a directory listing (this would mean opening every file in the dir on list). Moving closer to rationalizing the ACL model and maybe moving the POSIX calls into a posix_acl VFS module rather than having them as first class citizens of the VFS. Jeremy. (This used to be commit f487f742cb903a06fbf2be006ddc9ce9063339ed) --- source3/modules/vfs_catia.c | 10 ---------- 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/modules/vfs_catia.c') diff --git a/source3/modules/vfs_catia.c b/source3/modules/vfs_catia.c index ab48c963ec..8b56be6cea 100644 --- a/source3/modules/vfs_catia.c +++ b/source3/modules/vfs_catia.c @@ -293,14 +293,6 @@ static NTSTATUS catia_get_nt_acl(vfs_handle_struct *handle, files_struct *fsp, return SMB_VFS_NEXT_GET_NT_ACL(handle, name, security_info, ppdesc); } -static NTSTATUS catia_set_nt_acl(vfs_handle_struct *handle, files_struct *fsp, - const char *name, uint32 security_info_sent, - struct security_descriptor *psd) -{ - return SMB_VFS_NEXT_SET_NT_ACL(handle, fsp, name, security_info_sent, - psd); -} - static int catia_chmod_acl(vfs_handle_struct *handle, const char *name, mode_t mode) { @@ -362,8 +354,6 @@ SMB_VFS_LAYER_TRANSPARENT}, {SMB_VFS_OP(catia_get_nt_acl), SMB_VFS_OP_GET_NT_ACL, SMB_VFS_LAYER_TRANSPARENT}, - {SMB_VFS_OP(catia_set_nt_acl), SMB_VFS_OP_SET_NT_ACL, -SMB_VFS_LAYER_TRANSPARENT}, /* POSIX ACL operations */ -- cgit