From 00b2cdf75e9bea25034440054b4acd91a179c86d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Allison Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 18:09:07 -0700 Subject: Yay ! Remove a VFS entry. Removed the set_nt_acl() call, this can only be done via fset_nt_acl() using an open file/directory handle. I'd like to do the same with get_nt_acl() but am concerned about efficiency problems with "hide unreadable/hide unwritable" when doing a directory listing (this would mean opening every file in the dir on list). Moving closer to rationalizing the ACL model and maybe moving the POSIX calls into a posix_acl VFS module rather than having them as first class citizens of the VFS. Jeremy. (This used to be commit f487f742cb903a06fbf2be006ddc9ce9063339ed) --- source3/modules/vfs_default.c | 12 ------------ 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/modules/vfs_default.c') diff --git a/source3/modules/vfs_default.c b/source3/modules/vfs_default.c index de801a2041..6ee677e376 100644 --- a/source3/modules/vfs_default.c +++ b/source3/modules/vfs_default.c @@ -1042,16 +1042,6 @@ static NTSTATUS vfswrap_fset_nt_acl(vfs_handle_struct *handle, files_struct *fsp return result; } -static NTSTATUS vfswrap_set_nt_acl(vfs_handle_struct *handle, files_struct *fsp, const char *name, uint32 security_info_sent, SEC_DESC *psd) -{ - NTSTATUS result; - - START_PROFILE(set_nt_acl); - result = set_nt_acl(fsp, security_info_sent, psd); - END_PROFILE(set_nt_acl); - return result; -} - static int vfswrap_chmod_acl(vfs_handle_struct *handle, const char *name, mode_t mode) { #ifdef HAVE_NO_ACL @@ -1446,8 +1436,6 @@ static vfs_op_tuple vfs_default_ops[] = { SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE}, {SMB_VFS_OP(vfswrap_fset_nt_acl), SMB_VFS_OP_FSET_NT_ACL, SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE}, - {SMB_VFS_OP(vfswrap_set_nt_acl), SMB_VFS_OP_SET_NT_ACL, - SMB_VFS_LAYER_OPAQUE}, /* POSIX ACL operations. */ -- cgit