From 30d0680106c74901d6fc0c993c3c4770cd2efb22 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Bartlett Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 09:30:21 +0000 Subject: Merge from 3.0: source/passdb/pdb_get_set.c: I agree with vl's #if 0 here, and am not quite sure what I was thinking with regard to the original code. Let's keep samba simple, and just remove it. source/rpc_server/srv_netlog_nt.c: Remove compleatly wrong comments. (There were correct, 2 years ago...) source/intl/lang_tdb.c: Add newline to debug message Andrew Bartlett (This used to be commit 2a8dbe03690b60f3d9c83de3cf6ce873aa0657bc) --- source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c | 13 ------------- 1 file changed, 13 deletions(-) (limited to 'source3/passdb') diff --git a/source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c b/source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c index 46c49be8b1..4a5a5759d4 100644 --- a/source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c +++ b/source3/passdb/pdb_get_set.c @@ -1045,19 +1045,6 @@ BOOL pdb_set_backend_private_data (SAM_ACCOUNT *sampass, void *private_data, if (!sampass) return False; -#if 0 - /* With this check backend_private_data_free_fn is *never* set - as the methods are never set anywhere. What is this - supposed to do ???? - - Volker - */ - - /* does this backend 'own' this SAM_ACCOUNT? */ - if (my_methods != sampass->private.backend_private_methods) - return False; -#endif - if (sampass->private.backend_private_data && sampass->private.backend_private_data_free_fn) { sampass->private.backend_private_data_free_fn(&sampass->private.backend_private_data); } -- cgit